Comments Thread For: Cotto Backs Adviser's Position on Canelo Rematch Clause
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
Thanks Rysandro, good one !
And there it is folks.
Those words, are exactly what I would expect from someone who genuinely wants the fight.
The rematch clause is a non-issue, so it cant be a sticking point.
Whatsup Gaby ?Comment
-
for those who dont know:
De La Hoya explaining, “If the fight is a great fight, there should be no reason why we shouldn’t do it again.”
“It’s close, but this fight should’ve been done two weeks ago. … If that’s what’s holding up everything, we can take it out,” De La Hoya said of the rematch clause. “It’s no big deal. We can negotiate in good faith when the time comes [for the next fight].”
De La Hoya said Penagaricano “brought up” the rematch clause.
“Cotto probably doesn’t even know what’s going on,” De La Hoya said. “All we’re waiting for is Gaby’s answer.
“The devil’s in the details. We need the [purse] percentage of the winner [established],” De La Hoya said. “We have all the sponsors lined up. We’re tracking some great numbers. We want to make sure we have all the time in the world to promote this major blockbuster. Let’s get this done!”Comment



Comment