Video: Mo Harris Knocks out Sergi Lyakovich

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #41
    Originally posted by enadeus
    Right so out of all his fights you choose to post that KO of him 3 days after his victory over Brewster, nice try. In any case, a win is a win but all I simply did was post the circumstances surrounding the loss.

    Me posting this clip was no more a coincidence than you needing to make an excuse about it with your 1st clip.

    It's an applicable topic right now. Sergi looked good agaisnt Brewster, but this is shown as a reminder to keep things real and in context.

    Comment

    • Bozo_no no
      Palabras de Piedra
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2005
      • 8906
      • 416
      • 496
      • 16,069

      #42
      Originally posted by Lpurchase
      Lyakovich is down for 8 seconds at the most on my count there. There is no way he didn't beat the count, which is what the referee indicates.
      Give it a rest.

      He was taking a pounding, and the stoppage was more than warrented.

      Comment

      • enadeus
        Brigada
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2004
        • 3696
        • 200
        • 271
        • 11,154

        #43
        Originally posted by Bozo_no no
        Me posting this clip was no more a coincidence than you needing to make an excuse about it with your 1st clip.

        It's an applicable topic right now. Sergi looked good agaisnt Brewster, but this is shown as a reminder to keep things real and in context.
        Keeping it in context? He had the flu and a bad reaction to a shot before the fight. If anything his victory over Brewster proved that his excuse is not bull****. It's documented by doctors.

        Comment

        • DarkSpyder
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Nov 2005
          • 702
          • 26
          • 20
          • 7,173

          #44
          He never assessed the fighter, did he? Assess the fighter after an eight rather than speed up a ten-count.

          Give it a rest? **** off.

          Comment

          • Bozo_no no
            Palabras de Piedra
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 8906
            • 416
            • 496
            • 16,069

            #45
            Originally posted by Lpurchase
            He never assessed the fighter, did he? Assess the fighter rather than speed up a ten-count.

            Give it a rest? **** off.

            Have you seen this fight? Yes or no.

            Comment

            • Bozo_no no
              Palabras de Piedra
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 8906
              • 416
              • 496
              • 16,069

              #46
              Originally posted by enadeus
              Keeping it in context? He had the flu and a bad reaction to a shot before the fight. If anything his victory over Brewster proved that his excuse is not bull****. It's documented by doctors.

              I love how Brewsters detached retina that required surgery is no excuse, but a cold is in this case.

              Get off his nuts. It's one thing to be proud of fighters of your own nationality, but some of you fruits are really sickening with the one sided outright flaming bias and cheer leading.

              He lost the fight. Deal with it.

              Comment

              • DarkSpyder
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Nov 2005
                • 702
                • 26
                • 20
                • 7,173

                #47
                No I haven't. What is your personal opinion on boxing refereeing? Should they assess after a genuine eight-count (where they have every right to stop the fight if necessary, which was probably the case there, but not definitely) or speed up the ten without assessing the fighter, which could prove unfair? The eight-count is much fairer to the boxer on the receiving end, and they've still got a huge opportunity to stop the fight.

                Comment

                • Bozo_no no
                  Palabras de Piedra
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 8906
                  • 416
                  • 496
                  • 16,069

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Lpurchase
                  No I haven't.

                  Everything you say after that isn't worth reading, because questioning the ref's judgement without taking into consideration what he stood there and whittnessed for the previous 9 rounds come in to play big time.

                  Sergi was taking a pounding, and the stoppage was more than justified.

                  Comment

                  • DarkSpyder
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Nov 2005
                    • 702
                    • 26
                    • 20
                    • 7,173

                    #49
                    So you didn't read after that? Nice work...I asked you a genuine question and you ducked it. Ok, if he was taking a genuine beating throughout the fight then the ref is entitled to show that sort of compassion. Fair enough. But what I'm saying is that the count was more than beaten, and the boxer wasn't assessed in my opinion. But I suppose that's what you get for showing an out-of-context clip, huh?

                    Comment

                    • Bozo_no no
                      Palabras de Piedra
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2005
                      • 8906
                      • 416
                      • 496
                      • 16,069

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Lpurchase
                      So you didn't read after that? Nice work...I asked you a genuine question and you ducked it. Ok, if he was taking a genuine beating throughout the fight then the ref is entitled to show that sort of compassion. Fair enough. But what I'm saying is that the count was more than beaten, and the boxer wasn't assessed in my opinion. But I suppose that's what you get for showing an out-of-context clip, huh?
                      Out of context? How do you know what is or isn't out of context when you hadn't even seen it?

                      lol

                      I didn't duck your question at all, it was discussed earlier.

                      The bottom line is that the reff is there to use his judgement, which he did, and which was the right call if you'd seen the fight, which you haven't.

                      Fights are stopped all the time in different time frames in and outside of a full or partial count.

                      It's a judgment call, and in this case, it was the correct one.

                      Save your complaining until you've seen the fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP