Excuses people will have if GGG wins?

[M Bison]

Are people supposed to impressed that GGG is fighting Lemieux?

Lol, what?

[brettWall]

LOL. Can't believe the mind-boggling hate GG gets in this site. It's the same group of angry fans like vultures hovering above a dead carcass. LOL. It's embarrassing.

What's funny to me is that GG is not even that popular. Broner is probably more popular internationally because of the Maidana fight.

A lot of friends and relatives don't even know who this GG is. You don't have to take my word for it by doing your own random survey in any street corner.

There may have been 5-8 posters that overrate him, but that's about it. And who doesn't do the same with their heroes?

Kovalev vs Ward is the right matchup to pursue. It's a 50/50 fight.

[Beater_of_ass]

He's lying.

Bet365 (world's biggest bookie site) has it 8-1.

No, I'm not lying. You need to bet 1400 on GGG to win 100. I can't think of a PPV fight with such lopsided odds aside from Tyson/Douglas. As stated even Floyd was thinking about giving that kind of mismatch for free and that fight is going to flop. At the end of the day, GGG is asking you to pay $50 in a fight he is favored to win 14-1.

[BrometheusBob.]

No, I'm not lying. You need to bet 1400 on GGG to win 100. I can't think of a PPV fight with such lopsided odds aside from Tyson/Douglas. As stated even Floyd was thinking about giving that kind of mismatch for free and that fight is going to flop. At the end of the day, GGG is asking you to pay $50 in a fight he is favored to win 14-1.

Tyson Douglas is a terrible comparison for two reasons-
1. the odds were way way worse in that fight. Tyson was three times the favorite. Would b like someone on the other side comparing this fight to one that was 5-1.
2. Douglas won.

[Beater_of_ass]

Tyson Douglas is a terrible comparison for two reasons-
1. the odds were way way worse in that fight. Tyson was three times the favorite. Would b like someone on the other side comparing this fight to one that was 5-1.
2. Douglas won.

It's a fair comparison because what's the last PPV fight that had worse than 14-1 odds? The last one I can remember is Tyson Douglas. There was no comparison between the two... other than the odds. It had nothing do do with the outcome of the fight. GGG could lose too. I'm still not paying $50 for a fight he has no business losing.

[Box-Office]

If you read my post properly it was a response to someone saying Khan needs to rematch Prescott. I don't think Khan should rematch Prescott because he's fallen into irrelevancy just like those other guys did. It wouldn't make sense to rematch him now.

That doesn't make Prescott any less of a journeyman or a goat herder. His career since then has proven that. 9-7 with a 20% KO ratio since Khan

I get it. You trawled through my posting history and thought you found some dirt onto me, only to get slapped back down into your place. You made this thread out of sheer frustration and bitterness over me clowning you, to try to start a confrontation with "Froch fans" (aka me lol) and you got verbally ******ed. Must be tough to deal with.

Let it go, kid.

I'm a fan of boxing and I don't need to have a horse in every race. I asked for excuses and they're apparently pre-made "oh he was the favorite". GGG is a divisive character.

You stated Khan shouldn't get **** for Prescott when you were high on Khan. Then you're mocking the same loss. You know f.cked up because you were trying so hard to come off as this righteous boxing fan and been on damage control and to cut the convo short you keep claiming imaginary points.


Clowning? You're literally living through me over the last few weeks. Your existence on this forum, which let's be honest makes a good chunk of your life revolves around me, again, me. Actually, wait a sec, I guess you're right when you say you're clowning me, you are budget version of me. Box-Office Lite.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I'm a fan of boxing

Stopped reading there

[Mukuro]

I don't think the matchmaker odds is a real good way to determine whether or not this is a compelling fight on PPV. The odds are more a testament to GGG's reputation than Lemiuex's inability.

Lemieux against Cotto or Canelo would be good PPVs, and the odds would be reasonably close. Does GGG being abnormally good make this less interesting? No, it makes it more interesting.

This is a PPV unification match between two all action fighters who happen to be p4p punchers, it will be stacked with a good undercard, and will be sold at reasonable price. Seriously, just be a boxing fan for a moment and enjoy instead of being a bitch.

[IronDanHamza]

I'm a fan of boxing and I don't need to have a horse in every race. I asked for excuses and they're apparently pre-made "oh he was the favorite". GGG is a divisive character.

You stated Khan shouldn't get **** for Prescott when you were high on Khan. Then you're mocking the same loss. You know f.cked up because you were trying so hard to come off as this righteous boxing fan and been on damage control and to cut the convo short you keep claiming imaginary points.


Clowning? You're literally living through me over the last few weeks. Your existence on this forum, which let's be honest makes a good chunk of your life revolves around me, again, me. Actually, wait a sec, I guess you're right when you say you're clowning me, you are budget version of me. Box-Office Lite.

There are no excuses.

Why are you acting like there's a large amount of people considering this a risk for Golovkin?

I have literally not seen a single person who hasn't picked him to win by KO.

[Robbie Barrett]

He's really 14-1?

I would have thought more like 7-1.

14-1, wow if true.

He's lying.

Bet365 (world's biggest bookie site) has it 8-1.

Best odds for Golovkin to win is 1/14. He's not lying.

http://www.oddschecker.com/boxing/ge...lemieux/winner