Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by FeFist View Post
    You said sanctioning rankings does not mean nothing, which means it must be worth something. You then said they held no weight or value to the quality of opponents.

    Basically I am pointing out your use of double negatives. For someone who goes on and on about the illiteracy of others, your grasp of the English language is atrocious.
    :AYWOoD:WOW! lmfao are you really this...off? I explained they didn't hold weight and then explained how. By holding any weight or value to the QUALITY (key word) of opponents.

    First you say its contradicting lol which made no sense at all. Now you're saying its double negatives. Which makes no sense even more!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
      Better question is...Who else would rank the guys you're talking about?


      Dont mention Ring, because we all know Oscars Ring Magizine is now irreverent now of days!
      Yes I know because Oscar is so biased toward Floyd

      I anticipated that you would discredit The Ring's rankings despite being the go-to rankings for over 100 years. But it doesn't make a difference because most of the those fighters were universally ranked there not just by The Ring Magazine.

      What puzzles me is if it's so easy then why hasn't anyone else been able to beat so many? Why is Floyd the only fighter who can beat 10 #1 ranked opponents (Ring Magazine). I mean with Oscar's help of course, can't forget that.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
        :AYWOoD:WOW! lmfao are you really this...off? I explained they didn't hold weight and then explained how. By holding any weight or value to the QUALITY (key word) of opponents.

        First you say its contradicting lol which made no sense at all. Now you're saying its double negatives. Which makes no sense even more!
        It does not make sense to you because your grasp of the English language is poor. In the English language a double negative will result in a positive ergo your first sentence literally meant that the sanctioning rankings meant something.

        Comment


        • How would he had fared against Floyds last ten opponents, all were near his weight class Oscar
          Hatton
          JMM
          Mosley
          Ortiz
          Cotto at 154
          Guerrero
          Canelo at 152
          Maidana TWICE
          Pac

          Yeah im sure he could've went undefeated, just like Floyd did, most of these guys are still fighting you still can try and you still couldnt do it, but WHO could? and thats just at or around WW. lets not mention his reign before these fights...

          Comment


          • oh dear khan, anyone tell you fasting was over cus you sound dehydrated and delusional....

            what he's suggesting, saying what he has, is that he'd have beat Floyd's resume twice over..... seriously someone slap this fool, is no one there on his team to shut him up really!

            considering I'm British, I take so much pleasure in him being snubbed as he has, because he's the worst representation of British boxing we have, the guy should just fade away. if Floyd is apparently so s#it, don't beg for a fight with him you dumb ****ing prick!!!!!

            Comment


            • I'm starting to think he's a bit "punchy".

              I mean how else can someone who has fought no one at Welterweight, has no world title, got ktfo by Garcia in his last world title fight and then in his last outing fought Algeri after ducking the biggest fight of his career vs Brook. How can someone who has done that seriously think they deserve a shot at Mayweather unless they have no short term memory whatsoever. Only explanation

              Comment


              • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                Yes I know because Oscar is so biased toward Floyd

                I anticipated that you would discredit The Ring's rankings despite being the go-to rankings for over 100 years. But it doesn't make a difference because most of the those fighters were universally ranked there not just by The Ring Magazine.

                What puzzles me is if it's so easy then why hasn't anyone else been able to beat so many? Why is Floyd the only fighter who can beat 10 #1 ranked opponents (Ring Magazine). I mean with Oscar's help of course, can't forget that.
                You know i would bash Ring. It means nothing anymore. Not like it use too. When i heard DLH bought it i felt horrible. A promoter owning Ring Magazine. It would be like Arum owning the WBO IBF and on.

                We as fans know who the guys are that deserve a shot at the top guy and the guys who dont. Lets say it was a title shot and Pascal won a title against Gonzales the other night. Hes the #1 guy in the rankings because of that. We all know thats shlt and Gonzales should be the champ. Then someone comes along and beats Pascal and wins a title from a guy who didnt deserve it.

                It can go on and on and on. SO screw the rankings and the sanctioning bodies and Ring too. Some pay attention to it like its a relivent part of making a fight interesting. I dont. But hey...its boxing!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by FeFist View Post
                  It does not make sense to you because your grasp of the English language is poor. In the English language a double negative will result in a positive ergo your first sentence literally meant that the sanctioning rankings meant something.
                  I speak 3 different languages and English is my Language i was born with and around. Obviously yours is in need of help. I never said the Sanctioning bodies meant nothing.

                  Been through all this with you before. Every time you fall short of making any sense whats so ever. Im above you in the intelligent level so really i shouldn't even be in a conversation with you. Its hopeless and no cure for whats wrong with you.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    What's your point?

                    He'd still go undefeated through Khan's resume and barely lose a round.

                    Especially if he were fighting Maidana in his prime like Khan did.


                    You could argue Mayweather didn't win, but of course Mayweather was the star of the show, so that was never gonna happen.


                    p.s. Mayweather is TBE as he puts it, why not let Maidana wear his gloves?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                      With 10 ounce gloves and of course the first fight was close.

                      You could argue Mayweather didn't win, but of course Mayweather is the star of the show, so that was never gonna happen.


                      p.s. Mayweather is TBE as he puts it, why not let Maidana wear his gloves?
                      Ok. And? He still beat him.

                      Like I already said, Mayweather would barely lose a round if e went through Khan's resume especially if he fought Maidana in his prime like Khan did.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP