Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
    Sanctioning rankings doesn't mean NOTHING! Holds no weight or value to quality of opponents.

    and you know that. Or should!
    Who said anything about sanctioning rankings?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
      Who said anything about sanctioning rankings?
      um you did.

      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
      Possibly because Floyd Mayweather actually fought ranked opponents.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by FeFist View Post
        The two sentences contradict one another.
        :AYWOoD: hows that?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
          LOL @ Khan saying Floyd cherry-picked all his career.

          Floyd is a 5 weight world champion, and has been on the P4P list since 1998. His resume absolutely ****S on Khan's.
          Khan mentions Cuenca as an example of a cherry-picked record, and then attempts to compare Cuenca with Mayweather.

          WTF?

          This dude has lost it completely.

          Mayweather is an example of the opposite, their records contrast perfectly.

          One is cherry-picked, one has faced/beaten more champions and high-level opponents than anyone else, ever !

          WTF?

          Khan is a fkn moron.

          I hope he lands the Dubai fight and Pac punches him silly.

          Even Golovkin who is over-rated and talks shht, is not as bad as Amir Khan.

          Comment


          • As soon as he came to the ring vs Hatton he would've fell apart from all the love ricky used to get. Match would've been over. I'm sure he wouldnt have beaten Cotto, or Canelo, or Shane after shane destroyed Margarito, Pac, or even Guerrero, I dont think he can beat maidana twice. Let alone beat all these guys in a row fight after fight.

            Comment


            • Amir, whilst we are on the subject of cherry-picking.....

              This guy wants to have a word with you.....

              Comment


              • Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
                um you did.
                Which part of that post refers to sanctioning rankings?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
                  :AYWOoD: hows that?
                  Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
                  Sanctioning rankings doesn't mean NOTHING! Holds no weight or value to quality of opponents.

                  and you know that. Or should!
                  You said sanctioning rankings does not mean nothing, which means it must be worth something. You then said they held no weight or value to the quality of opponents.

                  Basically I am pointing out your use of double negatives. For someone who goes on and on about the illiteracy of others, your grasp of the English language is atrocious.

                  Comment


                  • LOL @ Khant. You're telling me Carlos Molina was a real contender? Give everyone a break Amere.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                      Which part of that post refers to sanctioning rankings?
                      Better question is...Who else would rank the guys you're talking about?


                      Dont mention Ring, because we all know Oscars Ring Magizine is now irreverent now of days!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP