Comments Thread For: Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 48526
    • 4,812
    • 267
    • 104,043

    #211
    Originally posted by PAC-BOY
    Sanctioning rankings doesn't mean NOTHING! Holds no weight or value to quality of opponents.

    and you know that. Or should!
    Who said anything about sanctioning rankings?

    Comment

    • PAC-BOY
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 55380
      • 4,125
      • 5,352
      • 157,380

      #212
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      Who said anything about sanctioning rankings?
      um you did.

      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      Possibly because Floyd Mayweather actually fought ranked opponents.

      Comment

      • PAC-BOY
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 55380
        • 4,125
        • 5,352
        • 157,380

        #213
        Originally posted by FeFist
        The two sentences contradict one another.
        :AYWOoD: hows that?

        Comment

        • aboutfkntime
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 47366
          • 1,631
          • 3,563
          • 391,308

          #214
          Originally posted by VG_Addict
          LOL @ Khan saying Floyd cherry-picked all his career.

          Floyd is a 5 weight world champion, and has been on the P4P list since 1998. His resume absolutely ****S on Khan's.
          Khan mentions Cuenca as an example of a cherry-picked record, and then attempts to compare Cuenca with Mayweather.

          WTF?

          This dude has lost it completely.

          Mayweather is an example of the opposite, their records contrast perfectly.

          One is cherry-picked, one has faced/beaten more champions and high-level opponents than anyone else, ever !

          WTF?

          Khan is a fkn moron.

          I hope he lands the Dubai fight and Pac punches him silly.

          Even Golovkin who is over-rated and talks shht, is not as bad as Amir Khan.

          Comment

          • HURTFEELINGS
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 2741
            • 143
            • 34
            • 18,198

            #215
            As soon as he came to the ring vs Hatton he would've fell apart from all the love ricky used to get. Match would've been over. I'm sure he wouldnt have beaten Cotto, or Canelo, or Shane after shane destroyed Margarito, Pac, or even Guerrero, I dont think he can beat maidana twice. Let alone beat all these guys in a row fight after fight.

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47366
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #216
              Amir, whilst we are on the subject of cherry-picking.....

              This guy wants to have a word with you.....

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 48526
                • 4,812
                • 267
                • 104,043

                #217
                Originally posted by PAC-BOY
                um you did.
                Which part of that post refers to sanctioning rankings?

                Comment

                • FeFist
                  No.1
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 9251
                  • 576
                  • 357
                  • 29,695

                  #218
                  Originally posted by PAC-BOY
                  :AYWOoD: hows that?
                  Originally posted by PAC-BOY
                  Sanctioning rankings doesn't mean NOTHING! Holds no weight or value to quality of opponents.

                  and you know that. Or should!
                  You said sanctioning rankings does not mean nothing, which means it must be worth something. You then said they held no weight or value to the quality of opponents.

                  Basically I am pointing out your use of double negatives. For someone who goes on and on about the illiteracy of others, your grasp of the English language is atrocious.

                  Comment

                  • SnakeVen0m
                    The Voice of Reason
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 4863
                    • 294
                    • 309
                    • 13,430

                    #219
                    LOL @ Khant. You're telling me Carlos Molina was a real contender? Give everyone a break Amere.

                    Comment

                    • PAC-BOY
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 55380
                      • 4,125
                      • 5,352
                      • 157,380

                      #220
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                      Which part of that post refers to sanctioning rankings?
                      Better question is...Who else would rank the guys you're talking about?


                      Dont mention Ring, because we all know Oscars Ring Magizine is now irreverent now of days!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP