Comments Thread For: Top Rank Sues Al Haymon For Over $100 Million

[STAX ON DECK]

lol whats the matter arum u broke ass joke now like oscar??smh haymon got stacks but aint none of them for giving out to bums like yall

sit down and rethink top stank cause ur promotion company is out big time now that haymon runs ur ****,

[Mitchell Kane]

Scipio's a huge SHO fan, but he goes overboard some times.

He was predicting Wilder-Molina would do near 2 million viewers...

Originally Posted by Scipio2009 View Post
Showtime gets Deontay Wilder, American heavyweight and WBC Heavyweight Champion, on their airwaves within the next 6 -7 weeks. (Basically the American audience equivalent of the type of fighters that thrill the Mexican fight audience)

If that fight ends up doing near 2m viewers on it's own, I'd hope that you would remember to sing the praise of Deontay Wilder as well.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...677194&page=10

When it ended up averaging 678k, he kinda shut up about it.

He likes to low and then pop back up in threads like this, spouting off about how great SHO Boxing is.

[HeroBando]

Scipio's a huge SHO fan, but he goes overboard some times.

He was predicting Wilder-Molina would do near 2 million viewers...



http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...677194&page=10

When it ended up averaging 678k, he kinda shut up about it.

He likes to low and then pop back up in threads like this, spouting off about how great SHO Boxing is.

He loves these ridiculous hypotheticals. Meanwhile Sho ratings tanking, Pbd ratings poor and dropping, while Hbos going up

[Barcham]

Beyond that, the channel picked up 3m homes with the Mayweather move

I'd like to see where he pulled that number from? Why would signing Mayweather to a PPV ONLY deal, which means you have no need of being a subscriber to watch the fight, bring in 3 million new subs to Showtime? A show like Californication or Shameless probably brought them more subs than boxing ever has.

The guy is a tool and makes the same kind of posts over on the RING web site comments. Thankfully I can put him on ignore and not have to read him here, something I wish I could do on RING but cannot.

[MrRolltide91]

welp here we go

[Scipio2009]

Lololol. Love these best case hypothticals. Sure seems like that's how Haymon is operating, spend a ton of investor money and hope for the best. Too bad it's not gonna work out, should have used some common sense. Oh well, its not his money, AGAIN

The PBC broadcasts so far have been leading the 18-54 demographic, the only demgraphic that advertisers care about, during their timeslot for most of the PBC shows.

If they continue to deliver in that demo, the channel that picks up the PBC series will have programming that would, in essence, deliver the strongest potential ad revenues for the time slots being filled.

[Scipio2009]

Scipio's a huge SHO fan, but he goes overboard some times.

He was predicting Wilder-Molina would do near 2 million viewers...



http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...677194&page=10

When it ended up averaging 678k, he kinda shut up about it.

He likes to low and then pop back up in threads like this, spouting off about how great SHO Boxing is.

Once HBO decided to run a competing card on the same night, there was no reason to keep talking about the massive number, since the audience would've been halved anyway. Again, people don't keep timelines for anything here.

Beyond that, let's make things plain; I don't enjoy seeing fights where the favorite walks in 40:1 up, To me that's not fun to watch. People can wet themselves over Golovkin punching out a can, or Canelo trouncing a James Kirkland (seconded by a trainer who hadn't had success at any level, pro or amateur); I'm not one of those people and I don't care for any of HBO's original series either.

Showtime has consistently delivered the better fights and fight cards, so i stick with Showtime (Did head to my regular bar to see Hopkins-Kovalev, and have yet to miss an Andre Ward fight, so I headed out for those too).

[Scipio2009]

I'd like to see where he pulled that number from? Why would signing Mayweather to a PPV ONLY deal, which means you have no need of being a subscriber to watch the fight, bring in 3 million new subs to Showtime? A show like Californication or Shameless probably brought them more subs than boxing ever has.

The guy is a tool and makes the same kind of posts over on the RING web site comments. Thankfully I can put him on ignore and not have to read him here, something I wish I could do on RING but cannot.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/bu...ns-on-hbo.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbade...ps-golden-boy/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Showtime_(TV_network)

21.3m homes in January 2012, ~22m homes by March 2013, and ~27.7m homes as of February 2015. If there was any other possible catalyst to drive near 6m homes to pick up Showtime just after Floyd signed with Showtime, I'd like to read it.

Beyond that, when Showtime signed Floyd to the 6-fight deal, they weren't just getting 6 PPV fights; they got all of the support programming featuring Mayweather (All Access, etc), they were able to air the fight replays on Showtime, and they also got all of the 'Mayweather Sweepstakes' fight cards (Canelo-Trout, Maidana-Broner, Porter-Brook, etc), in addition to having boxing's biggest star as the face of Showtime Boxing

[!! Shawn]

The PBC broadcasts so far have been leading the 18-54 demographic, the only demgraphic that advertisers care about, during their timeslot for most of the PBC shows.

If they continue to deliver in that demo, the channel that picks up the PBC series will have programming that would, in essence, deliver the strongest potential ad revenues for the time slots being filled.

Expect that the ad revenues the could command come nowhere near to what they are spending on each show,

[Pigeons]

He loves these ridiculous hypotheticals. Meanwhile Sho ratings tanking, Pbd ratings poor and dropping, while Hbos going up

Wilder-Molina outdrew both competing HBO fights that night even though SHO is in 5-10M less homes.