Rank your Wleterweights

[LacedUp]

Although Porter alone is a better single win than anything on Keith's resume, I feel Keith has more quantity. You could say quality > quantity but there's not much in it imo.

My ranking aren't based on resume alone anyway.

Ok i politely disagree. Other than their best wins, where Brook has the clear better win, their resume's are quite equal - but even then, Brook probably has the better.

If you base it on H2H or factor that in heavily, that's another discussion of course.

[John Locke]

Ok i politely disagree. Other than their best wins, where Brook has the clear better win, their resume's are quite equal - but even then, Brook probably has the better.

If you base it on H2H or factor that in heavily, that's another discussion of course.

Nah no chance man, definitely disagree on that.

Chaves is Thurman's best win. Other than that, he's beat Guerrero, Bundu, Karass, I don't think Kell has beat anyone better than those guys (except Porter)

I mean who is Kell's second best win? Probably Jones, who has been beaten by Karass.

I rate Kell highly and it's reasonable to rank him above Thurman, but other than Porter his resume is thinner than Thurman's.

My rankings are mostly based on what I think would happen H2H and the eye test, with resume playing some part.

[LacedUp]

Nah no chance man, definitely disagree on that.

Chaves is Thurman's best win. Other than that, he's beat Guerrero, Bundu, Karass, I don't think Kell has beat anyone better than those guys (except Porter)

I mean who is Kell's second best win? Probably Jones, who has been beaten by Karass.

I rate Kell highly and it's reasonable to rank him above Thurman, but other than Porter his resume is thinner than Thurman's.

My rankings are mostly based on what I think would happen H2H and the eye test, with resume playing some part.

Ok I clearly think Guerrero is thurman's best win.

I don't think the likes of bundu and Karass are better than Matthew Hatton, Senchenko etc.

If we're talking H2H I would have Errol Spence in my top 10.

[Bushbaby]

Obviously Khan cannot be ranked above..

Brook
Thurman
Porter
Bradley..................

[ShoulderRoll]

Chaves + Guerrero > Porter.

[king4oranges]

Mayweather
Pacquioa
bradley
khan
thurman
brook
madiana
alexander
gurrerro

[revs1227]

It's may weather pac Bradley brook .....lporter maidana Thurman far behind the top 4

[kiaba360]

Champion: Mayweather
#1 Manny Pacquiao
#2 Kell Brook
#3 Bradley
#4 Porter
#5 Thurman
#6 Maidana
#7 Amir Khan
#8 Devon Alexander
#9 Guerrero
#10 Rios/Chaves or someone like that-

Left Marquez out because he's been inactive for more than a year.

I like this one. No ranking is flawless because the majority of #2-#10 haven't fought each other yet.

[soul_survivor]

Champion: Mayweather
#1 Manny Pacquiao
#2 Kell Brook
#3 Bradley
#4 Porter
#5 Thurman
#6 Maidana
#7 Amir Khan
#8 Devon Alexander
#9 Guerrero
#10 Rios/Chaves or someone like that-

Left Marquez out because he's been inactive for more than a year.

I can understand people ranking Maidana above Khan at 147, I say fair enough. But Thurman? In fact, Thurman is above Maidana in your rankings? For what? Khan beating Alexander, annihilating Collazo and having a good fight with Algieri is better than Thurman's one-two of Bundu and hsot to ****, never was a welterweight Guerrero. That's ridiculous man.

Maybe if Thurman had stopped both Bundu and Guerrero and showed he was levels above those guys then I could get you. Right now, all of you are desperate to get on the next American bandwagon and it undermines any boxing integrity you may have.

Obviously Khan cannot be ranked above..

Brook
Thurman
Porter
Bradley..................

Brook and Bradley rank above but Porter and Thurman? GTFO

Mayweather
Pacquioa
bradley
khan
thurman
brook
madiana
alexander
gurrerro

Pretty decent list but no way does Guerrero deserve a top 10 spot.

[soul_survivor]

1. mayweather
2. pacquiao
3. brook
4. bradley
5. thurman
6. maidana
7. porter
8. khan
9. ali
10. spence jr