Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Klitschko vs. Fury Purse Bid Ordered For July 6th

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
    Ignorant people here are conflating physical appearance with athleticism. Sure Wlad would make for a better coverman for Men's Fitness but he doesn't have half the stamina that Fury does. Wlad threw but 18 punches a round vs Pulev and was huffing and puffing by the 5th. Fury is the all round better mover with Wlad being about as nimble as Frankenstein.
    How many 12 round fights as Klitschko fought won amd dominated and how many as Fury fought, take into account world class opposition and Fury chalks up a big fat 0.

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...45_634x428.jpg

    Dude be looking like a real athlete lol, he's supposed to be in the prime years of his life, his mid to late twenties go through Wladimir's photos and you will never see one of him looking so gross in comparison to Fury. Wlad has everything Fury lacks from athleticism right through to dedication, and most importantly self belief. Fury when talking about himself can not help laughing, smirking and grinning as though he enjoying the moment more himself in which he talking about himself, it's like one huge joke he enjoys hearing himself. Now please do not try to tell me he takes himself seriously.
    Last edited by Jewish-Reptile; 06-28-2015, 10:33 AM.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
      I'm not hurt at all, I just fail to grasp how Fury is going to cause these problems. His jab when not illegal is simply a scoring jab, Wlad's left arm carries as much menace as his right, the most feared right hand in the divison.

      Fury whatever way you look at it or dress it up ducked Ustinov and Pulev, he could have been mandated a long time ago had you say faced a guy rooted in cement. Not only did he elect to forgo the IBF ordered eliminators he also dropped out of the WBC ordered eliminators too ! Upon Stiverne vs Arreola being ordered for the vacant belt, he became loudly vocal himself about Arreola being given the shot, the same Arreola whom was called up upon him removing himself, I remember a certain twitter tirade about some '*******' issues he developed. Nice try, real cute

      Fury has fought one of two ways, either behind his jab or wildly gung ho when coming from behind on the cards, relying heavily on dubious and questionable tactics. If he falls behind on the cards, is dropped, takes a knee or for whatever other reason upon trying to make up a points deficit I expect he will revert to type as he has shown historically and outside of the UK where he has had favourable decisions go his way he can expect none of that bar more deductions for his infractions, with the standard of refereeing at the highest level their is absolutely no chance he can utilise his illegal and rough house tactics. The kid is in for a long long night if he makes it beyond the fourth.

      Your post as always fails to give Wlad the slightest credit, you're in short saying Wlad can not adapt and will fight the same way he always has. Do you not believe Wlad makes adjustments and adapts in each and every successive fight when facing a different opponent and a new threat to his dominance ? I can't wrap my head around blind hate and biased Brit fan boy-ism. I've heard it so many times before. As David Haye said, "this is gonna be more one sided than gang ****"

      Define not looking good ? Winning every round bar one and taking scores of 118-109 on judges score cards to me is looking good. I'll have to agree to disagree on this one, maybe.
      If you're not hurt then why are you saying things like "Klitschko haters..." "you see what you want to see..." etc? I'm giving my views on this fight, which I feel is a good fight. If you can't handle that without getting into that mode, then don't respond to me. I don't think anything I said was "hater like" or close.

      Wlad's left jab is also just a scoring jab. He doesn't use it as a ramrod any longer and hasn't for a long time. He's pawing with the jab 9/10 times and mostly pokes it these days. Go and watch his tapes.

      Ok - Let's go into it, since you wish to go there. Fury had a fight lined up with Chisora, on 3 days notice he chooses to fight Ustinov instead. The day before the fight, his uncle, former trainer and brother of his trainer falls deadly ill and dies a few weeks later or whatever it was. You are sick in the head if you think Fury should have fought instead of being with his family member.

      Now, Pulev. He was offered £5million to fight David Haye instead of taking that fight and took it. He'd just fought an eliminator for that belt. Now, since we're comparing to who Wlad did and did not duck - Did he not also pull out of a scheduled Chisora fight TWICE and here's the kicker - To fight David Haye. Whatever, have your fanboy double standards.

      When had Fury ever had a "dubious decision"? As for you talking about Tyson Fury and illegal tactics in a discussion about Wlad.... I'll leave others to judge you on that.

      But he more or less does fight the same way every time? Sure he adapts from time to time, but it's not like he ever does anything drastic in fights to adapt. Possibly the Pulev fight is one where I saw him make some adjustments and win impressively. Other than that, I don't recall him making many changes in a fight. Mostly because his opposition aren't good enough to force him to. I remember a certain Manny Stewart being pretty pissed off at Wlad for this same reason. Inability to adapt in the ring. Or his willingness to.

      I have given Wlad plenty of credit often. But you only look at the criticism I give him. That's up to you. I don't think I should say he's a great fighter to watch when I don't think he is and the majority of the fans on this forum share my opinion. Why would I start saying he does a million things well when he doesn't? he does a few things well and extremely well and he does it over and over again. Most of his fights are repeats of the last one.

      You might think it's great to see a heavyweight champion out size someone by 25 lbs and 3 inches pittypad and hold his way to a boring decision, but I don't. And I know Wlad would have dealt with Jennings differently if this was 2009.

      However, I'm not only talking about the Jennings fight. He was slow and sluggish in the Povetkin fight, came out cold vs Pulev and was overall just sloppy vs Jennings too. Most people share my opinion.

      Objective posters that is. Not someone like you.
      Last edited by LacedUp; 06-28-2015, 10:31 AM.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
        If you're not hurt then why are you saying things like "Klitschko haters..." "you see what you want to see..." etc? I'm giving my views on this fight, which I feel is a good fight. If you can't handle that without getting into that mode, then don't respond to me. I don't think anything I said was "hater like" or close.

        Wlad's left jab is also just a scoring jab. He doesn't use it as a ramrod any longer and hasn't for a long time. He's pawing with the jab 9/10 times and mostly pokes it these days. Go and watch his tapes.

        Ok - Let's go into it, since you wish to go there. Fury had a fight lined up with Chisora, on 3 days notice he chooses to fight Ustinov instead. The day before the fight, his uncle, former trainer and brother of his trainer falls deadly ill and dies a few weeks later or whatever it was. You are sick in the head if you think Fury should have fought instead of being with his family member.

        Now, Pulev. He was offered £5million to fight David Haye instead of taking that fight and took it. He'd just fought an eliminator for that belt. Now, since we're comparing to who Wlad did and did not duck - Did he not also pull out of a scheduled Chisora fight TWICE and here's the kicker - To fight David Haye. Whatever, have your fanboy double standards.

        When had Fury ever had a "dubious decision"? As for you talking about Tyson Fury and illegal tactics in a discussion about Wlad.... I'll leave others to judge you on that.

        But he more or less does fight the same way every time? Sure he adapts from time to time, but it's not like he ever does anything drastic in fights to adapt. Possibly the Pulev fight is one where I saw him make some adjustments and win impressively. Other than that, I don't recall him making many changes in a fight. Mostly because his opposition aren't good enough to force him to. I remember a certain Manny Stewart being pretty pissed off at Wlad for this same reason. Inability to adapt in the ring. Or his willingness to.

        I have given Wlad plenty of credit often. But you only look at the criticism I give him. That's up to you. I don't think I should say he's a great fighter to watch when I don't think he is and the majority of the fans on this forum share my opinion. Why would I start saying he does a million things well when he doesn't? he does a few things well and extremely well and he does it over and over again. Most of his fights are repeats of the last one.

        You might think it's great to see a heavyweight champion out size someone by 25 lbs and 3 inches pittypad and hold his way to a boring decision, but I don't. And I know Wlad would have dealt with Jennings differently if this was 2009.

        However, I'm not only talking about the Jennings fight. He was slow and sluggish in the Povetkin fight, came out cold vs Pulev and was overall just sloppy vs Jennings too. Most people share my opinion.

        Objective posters that is. Not someone like you.
        Fan boys and biased fans don't have the luxury of being bestowed 'objective'.

        Against Povetkin whom he dropped four times I take it he didn't 'look good' in your book of 'looking good' Povetkin and Jennings employed the same tactics, trying to come up and under the guard, he worked well except for the part whereby they could not negate the customary defence of Wlad. Fury for all his many, I say many without trying to laugh here lol, attributes will and simply can not employ that same tactic that saw Wlad 'not look good'.

        Chisora was kept out of the ring for nearly a year because Wlad jerked him around, I'll accept that, the first injury possibly legit, maybe he just wanted to spend his first Christmas with his new partner without any bumps and bruises hardly professional but the guy had just fallen in love. The second and truth of the situation was Haye brought along the Chisora rescheduled fight postponement by stating he had to face Wlad before his birthday or no fight, was he supposed to fight Chisora with then an immediate camp for Haye ? Make me laugh some more, I'm begging you.

        Like I said, dress it up as you will. A duck is a duck, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. Unfortunately for his fans, Fury has a track record. Say what you will.

        I can be objective, I object to Fury being a threat to the tyrannical rule of Wlad.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
          Chisora was kept out of the ring for nearly a year because Wlad jerked him around, I'll accept that, the first injury possibly legit, maybe he just wanted to spend his first Christmas with his new partner without any bumps and bruises hardly professional but the guy had just fallen in love. The second and truth of the situation was Haye brought along the Chisora rescheduled fight postponement by stating he had to face Wlad before his birthday or no fight, was he supposed to fight Chisora with then an immediate camp for Haye ? Make me laugh some more, I'm begging you.

          Like I said, dress it up as you will. A duck is a duck, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. Unfortunately for his fans, Fury has a track record. Say what you will.
          So you're agreeing Wlad ducked Chisora since the two were literally the exact same situations?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            If you're not hurt then why are you saying things like "Klitschko haters..." "you see what you want to see..." etc? I'm giving my views on this fight, which I feel is a good fight. If you can't handle that without getting into that mode, then don't respond to me. I don't think anything I said was "hater like" or close.

            When had Fury ever had a "dubious decision"? As for you talking about Tyson Fury and illegal tactics in a discussion about Wlad.... I'll leave others to judge you on that.
            Hater, I'll define if you like. You're desperate to see Wlad beaten to the point it goes beyond the borders of hate, it's humouring reading what is wrote about him. As I said you can't say anything positive even when Wlad is winning fights 118-109 and 119-104 only he didnt 'look good'. Lol

            I've heard your views, good for you. You like to consider yourself as knowledgable and your opinion carries weight, yet everything you state is all subjective and questionable especially when stating a guy who won 118-109 and 119-104 wasnt impressive and 'did no look good', how is it I or anyone else can take you serious coming out saying these things ? Lets compare Wlad to seven years ago, he was winning 12 round decisions in the same manner he is now ! And you're saying he has slipped and has slowed down, lol. Show me the evidence, please, I'm begging you.

            His jab is and left hook, crosses etc are as frighteningly powerful now if not more powerful. See what you will

            You're a hater.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
              Hater, I'll define if you like. You're desperate to see Wlad beaten to the point it goes beyond the borders of hate, it's humouring reading what is wrote about him. As I said you can't say anything positive even when Wlad is winning fights 118-109 and 119-104 only he didnt 'look good'. Lol

              I've heard your views, good for you. You like to consider yourself as knowledgable and your opinion carries weight, yet everything you state is all subjective and questionable especially when stating a guy who won 118-109 and 119-104 wasnt impressive and 'did no look good', how is it I or anyone else can take you serious coming out saying these things ? Lets compare Wlad to seven years ago, he was winning 12 round decisions in the same manner he is now ! And you're saying he has slipped and has slowed down, lol. Show me the evidence, please, I'm begging you.

              His jab is and left hook, crosses etc are as frighteningly powerful now if not more powerful. See what you will

              You're a hater.
              I feel sorry for you.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
                How many 12 round fights as Klitschko fought won amd dominated and how many as Fury fought, take into account world class opposition and Fury chalks up a big fat 0.

                http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...45_634x428.jpg

                Dude be looking like a real athlete lol, he's supposed to be in the prime years of his life, his mid to late twenties go through Wladimir's photos and you will never see one of him looking so gross in comparison to Fury. Wlad has everything Fury lacks from athleticism right through to dedication, and most importantly self belief. Fury when talking about himself can not help laughing, smirking and grinning as though he enjoying the moment more himself in which he talking about himself, it's like one huge joke he enjoys hearing himself. Now please do not try to tell me he takes himself seriously.
                How many times has Wlad completely gassed out in fights? He's never had good or even decent stamina. This is one of the reasons why he illegally clinches so much. If he was forced to fight for 3 minutes of every round he would completely fall to pieces. We saw how easily Brewster beat him when they took the holding from him. The first time I saw this guy fight was live on the Lewis/Botha undercard vs Barrett and he was knackered by the 5th round even though he barely threw any punches.
                Fury is a self confident, cawky fighter. He doesn't think he will beat Klit, he knows he will beat him and That's the thing. Wlad's spent his career fighting bums and no hopers who came to lay down to get a paycheck. Brewster and Sanders were among the few mediocre journeymen that flipped the script and actually tried to win and look what they did to him.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  So you're agreeing Wlad ducked Chisora since the two were literally the exact same situations?
                  Wlad had a signed fight, he intended to fight him or he would have never signed, Fury shat himself at the thought of signing a competitive fight versus a WBC mandated eliminator and an opponent for the IBF who had just stopped two hulking behemoths comparable to Fury. Ustinov the situation was odd, he we had a guy ready to go, yet upon discovering Ustinov had done a full camp they vetoed the notion previously of taking on a replacement less than 48 hours before fight night. You have your views and beliefs, I have mine.

                  It was a duck.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                    I feel sorry for you.
                    The feeling is mutual, though I'll never give up on you as I know you'll be a boxing fan post Klitschko era.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
                      Wlad had a signed fight, he intended to fight him or he would have never signed, Fury shat himself at the thought of signing a competitive fight versus a WBC mandated eliminator and an opponent for the IBF who had just stopped two hulking behemoths comparable to Fury. Ustinov the situation was odd, he we had a guy ready to go, yet upon discovering Ustinov had done a full camp they vetoed the notion previously of taking on a replacement less than 48 hours before fight night. You have your views and beliefs, I have mine.

                      It was a duck.
                      You're saying Wlad didn't duck despite signing for a fight twice and pulled out twice whereas Fury was offered a fight to earn 100x more and never signed? Are you serious right now?

                      I know you're a big Klitschko fan and that's fine, but please have some common sense. they both went for the money fight. If one was a duck, both were ducks. it was literally identical situations with the same fighter!

                      As I said, you're sick in your head if you think Fury should fight instead of being with his dying family member.

                      Absolutely sick in your head.

                      Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
                      The feeling is mutual, though I'll never give up on you as I know you'll be a boxing fan post Klitschko era.
                      Yes I will. I was a fan before his "era" too. Question is how much you'll be around once he's gone?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP