Comments Thread For: Golovkin Eyes Winning ESPY 'Best Fighter' Award

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #91
    Originally posted by Barcham
    You do understand that Mayweather did not fight Manny in 2014, Canelo either? All he did was fight Maidana TWICE. Two fights against the same guy, neither of which was anywhere close to fight of the year, do not make Floyd 'Fighter of the Year', not fighter of the past three years. Even if you add the Manny fight to the mix, it does not help at all.

    Now if you want to create a category for the best fighter who has learned the elusive art of 'fighting without fighting', then Floyd will be a guaranteed winner.
    It's awarded for the last 12 months not 2014, it even mentions the Pacquiao fight when you click to vote on the site.

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47366
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #92
      Originally posted by Barcham
      How about Ward - GGG at 160, 15 rounds, anywhere but Oakland with decent officials who will enforce the rules to the letter, winner take all?
      That would be as silly as Mayweather/Golovkin at 154.

      One fighter would clearly be compromised.

      15 round fights are illegal in most states.

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47366
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #93
        Originally posted by i'm a fun haver
        Do you cry when GGG says he would fight Floyd?
        Personally, I laugh !

        Comment

        • MarsinLeo
          Contender
          • Jun 2015
          • 292
          • 24
          • 1
          • 6,339

          #94
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          It's awarded for the last 12 months not 2014, it even mentions the Pacquiao fight when you click to vote on the site.
          Thanks for the correction.

          This Barcham guy is emotionally tied to GGG.

          If GGG has a bad day, so does Barcham. If GGG says he moving down to 154, Barcham declares GGG the best at 154. If GGG moves up to 168, Barcham will declare GGG the best at 168.

          If GGG says drinking urine is the way to go, guess what Barcham does next?

          Comment

          • Barcham
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2015
            • 4263
            • 158
            • 65
            • 11,189

            #95
            Originally posted by MarsinLeo
            I didn't realize the ESPY was only for 2014. My bad. With that said though, two wins over Maidana is still better than wins over Rubio and Geale.

            Can you agree with that?
            No, because of the fact that Floyd's fights always go the distance and barely qualify as FIGHTS due to the number of punches that are thrown.

            Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
            It's awarded for the last 12 months not 2014, it even mentions the Pacquiao fight when you click to vote on the site.
            In that case there is even less reason to vote for Floyd. I never noticed that as I did not click on Floyd's image as I did not wish to vote for him in error. The rematch against Maidana was almost as dull and boring as the Pacquaio fight. Both of them together could be packaged on a DVD as a sleep aid. As already mentioned, this is the best FIGHTER award, not best BOXER award. As such I do not think Floyd even deserves a nomination.

            If the category had been best boxer, then yes, Floyd may well have gotten my vote. But not as best FIGHTER. It also goes to show how boxing has slipped when it does not rate it's own category in a popularity contest. I would have thought it deserved a boxer of the year as well as a fight of the year category.

            Comment

            • Barcham
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2015
              • 4263
              • 158
              • 65
              • 11,189

              #96
              Originally posted by MarsinLeo
              Thanks for the correction.

              This Barcham guy is emotionally tied to GGG.

              If GGG has a bad day, so does Barcham. If GGG says he moving down to 154, Barcham declares GGG the best at 154. If GGG moves up to 168, Barcham will declare GGG the best at 168.

              If GGG says drinking urine is the way to go, guess what Barcham does next?
              You really do not follow my posts at all, do you? Surprising as you are so obviously an alt and are probably quite familiar with most active members here.

              I think GGG is the best at 160, yes. I think there is no reason at all for him to drop to 154 to fight anyone, including Floyd, it serves no purpose at all. I also do not believe he should fight at 168 for anything other than a major PPV fight as a one off. Other than that, he should focus on 160 until he has achieved his goal of unification and then move up permanently to 168 if that is what he wishes to do.

              Now you can go **** yourself.

              Have a nice day.

              Comment

              • Easy Work.
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2014
                • 1976
                • 86
                • 14
                • 2,636

                #97
                Golovkin isnt getting that award, its going to go to rousey or mayweather.

                Comment

                • i'm a fun haver
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 2651
                  • 87
                  • 143
                  • 9,236

                  #98
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                  Personally, I laugh !
                  The things that make you laugh can be the same thing that make you cry.
                  GGG would knock Floyd's head off his shoulders if that fight ever happened.
                  You would have to quit watching boxing lol

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47366
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Barcham
                    No, because of the fact that Floyd's fights always go the distance and barely qualify as FIGHTS due to the number of punches that are thrown.

                    In that case there is even less reason to vote for Floyd. I never noticed that as I did not click on Floyd's image as I did not wish to vote for him in error. The rematch against Maidana was almost as dull and boring as the Pacquaio fight. Both of them together could be packaged on a DVD as a sleep aid. As already mentioned, this is the best FIGHTER award, not best BOXER award. As such I do not think Floyd even deserves a nomination.

                    If the category had been best boxer, then yes, Floyd may well have gotten my vote. But not as best FIGHTER. It also goes to show how boxing has slipped when it does not rate it's own category in a popularity contest. I would have thought it deserved a boxer of the year as well as a fight of the year category.
                    Rubbish !

                    This popularity contest is attempting to honor the best competitor within the sport of boxing, regardless as to their style.

                    Again, you are focusing on the term " fighter ", and not on the term " best "..... which is kinda silly really.

                    Comment

                    • Robbie Barrett
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 40891
                      • 2,779
                      • 667
                      • 570,921

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Barcham
                      No, because of the fact that Floyd's fights always go the distance and barely qualify as FIGHTS due to the number of punches that are thrown.



                      In that case there is even less reason to vote for Floyd. I never noticed that as I did not click on Floyd's image as I did not wish to vote for him in error. The rematch against Maidana was almost as dull and boring as the Pacquaio fight. Both of them together could be packaged on a DVD as a sleep aid. As already mentioned, this is the best FIGHTER award, not best BOXER award. As such I do not think Floyd even deserves a nomination.

                      If the category had been best boxer, then yes, Floyd may well have gotten my vote. But not as best FIGHTER. It also goes to show how boxing has slipped when it does not rate it's own category in a popularity contest. I would have thought it deserved a boxer of the year as well as a fight of the year category.
                      It used to be called Best Boxer Of The Year they changed it to include MMA for 2007. Since the change only Mayweather (6 times) and Pacquiao (2 times) have won it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP