Con, Brook has something you need to attract a big money fight. He has a welterweight title. You have no title and trying to get a big payday. You fought bums most of your career as well and lost to some of them. Brook never lost. He brings something to the table. Now bring your ass to the table to be chewed off.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Khan: No Pay For Brook, Fought Bums His Whole Career
Collapse
-
Brook's people need to move on and stop begging for the Khan fight. In Khan's mind the fight will always be there for him no matter how many times he loses. Why is it hard for Brook and his team to adapt the same mentality?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FLYBOY View PostDid you watch Khan-Peterson? Did you look at all the controversy surrounding the decision? Khan beat Peterson. Khan won that fight. He was robbed in daylight.
Khan lost to Garcia and Prescott, yes but you're also forgetting his dominating wins over Alexander and his 12 round fight with Maidana, and his destruction of Malignaggi and Judah.
Khan has been calling out good fighters for so long now. None of them come to the table.
Some of them who rejected Khan's call outs: Bradley, Broner, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Cotto, Marquez (yes, JMM. Look it up).
Khan has the deepest resume at 140 and 147 after Mayweather and Pacquiao. No doubt.
He lost a close fight, that's all.
Kindly expand on Khan's 'deep' resume ay 147 please, especially when you are putting him behind only Manny and Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FLYBOY View Post
Some of them who rejected Khan's call outs: Bradley, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Cotto, Marquez (yes, JMM. Look it up).
Comment
-
Originally posted by FlatLine View PostBrook's a good fighter but we all know Khan's right - Brook only has ONE decent name on his whole resume against Porter, and we all know Porter's B-level at best.
Khan's resume is literally 10 times better than Brooks at this point. Its no question, no debate really. Or as Floyd Sr would say ain't no diggidy and no doubt. Anyone who tries to argue that Brook's resume is somehow better is trolling plain and simple, just ignore them.
So ur argument sounds like Khan doesnt have to face anybody legit NOW bcuz of what hes done BEFORE Garcia..is that right? Conveniently not mentioning the Garcia fight bcuz Khan hasnt been a Champ since.
So if the criteria for a Floyd fight is based on past accomplishments rather than CURRENT standing then DelaHoya is the best option for Sept. If the criteria is a fighters CURRENT standing, then Brook is the best option.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by b00g13man View PostKhan fanboys man. Really rivalling Bumlovkin's at the moment.
Wow!!! Stay classy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EHDM View PostI well agree with you that Bradley ducked Khan for the same reason Khan is ducking Brook. They don't want to risk a payday that's almost guaranteed. The others you mentioned had other business to take care off to even bother thinking about Khan
Khan wants to expand his name in the USA. He has been calling out fighters BETTER than Brook.
Khan has called out Mayweather, Pacquiao, Cotto amongst many others.
Khan is not ducking Brook. He just has no reason to fight Brook at the moment.
Comment
Comment