Comments Thread For: Khan: No Pay For Brook, Fought Bums His Whole Career

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yup. Kell Brook's resume is nothing special. Who did Brook just fight? I don't even know his name but he was a crap opponent.

Khan is a much better fighter than Brook. He's levels up. And he will beat that a$$ when they fight.

It's just that Khan would rather fight guys (Mayweather, Pacquiao, Cotto) who would bring more money, and/ or more exposure to the American market.

Algieri doe

[FLYBOY]

Algieri doe

Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Collazo, Alexander...

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Collazo, Alexander...

So what. He just chose to fight Chris Algieri over Kell Brook. There's no excuse for that. It did nothing to help him in "the American market" cos Algieri was seen as a joke and Khan looked like **** in the fight

[LacedUp]

Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Collazo, Alexander...

absolute killers there.

Kotelnik = 35% KO ratio
Malignaggi = 18% KO ratio
Collazo = 45% KO ratio
Alexander = 48% KO ratio
Judah = 55% KO ratio
Algieri = 36% KO ratio

- It's a list of beasts Khan's has fought!

Surprised no one sees a clear pattern in this list.

[FLYBOY]

absolute killers there.

Kotelnik = 35% KO ratio
Malignaggi = 18% KO ratio
Collazo = 45% KO ratio
Alexander = 48% KO ratio
Judah = 55% KO ratio
Algieri = 36% KO ratio

- It's a list of beasts Khan's has fought!

Surprised no one sees a clear pattern in this list.

Come on, not everything has to do with power. Skill matters.

And, look at Kell Brook's opponents' KO ratios, then talk.

Oh, you forgot Maidana: 78% KO ratio.

[FLYBOY]

So what. He just chose to fight Chris Algieri over Kell Brook. There's no excuse for that. It did nothing to help him in "the American market" cos Algieri was seen as a joke and Khan looked like **** in the fight

so what?

Relax, sweetheart. Khan will fight Brook, and destroy him.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

so what?

Relax, sweetheart. Khan will fight Brook, and destroy him.

You're willing to accept **** sandwiches like Algieri for 2 years

Not much of a boxing fan

[Box-Office]

absolute killers there.

Kotelnik = 35% KO ratio
Malignaggi = 18% KO ratio
Collazo = 45% KO ratio
Alexander = 48% KO ratio
Judah = 55% KO ratio
Algieri = 36% KO ratio

- It's a list of beasts Khan's has fought!

Surprised no one sees a clear pattern in this list.

What's wrong with having 45 or 48% KO ratios? That's almost half or even 55%? Not to mention why the hell is power ranking so high for you when we know it means jack **** by itself?

Where was that KO ratio when Malignaggi stopped Brook's second best win in Senchenko in his home country?

You have the nerve to shred Khan's opponents, but in response what do you have? Porter? That is where it begins and ends.

[LacedUp]

Come on, not everything has to do with power. Skill matters.

And, look at Kell Brook's opponents' KO ratios, then talk.

Oh, you forgot Maidana: 78% KO ratio.

No but that's what makes most great pro fighters. The pro game is about hurting your opponent. This isn't the amateurs.

I obviously left out Maidana because he's a good puncher and a great win for Khan. But the rest.. meh. They are good, but none were above good. B- wins more or less.

[LacedUp]

What's wrong with having 45 or 48% KO ratios? That's almost half or even 55%? Not to mention why the hell is power ranking so high for you when we know it means jack **** by itself?

Where was that KO ratio when Malignaggi stopped Brook's second best win in Senchenko in his home country?

You have the nerve to shred Khan's opponents, but in response what do you have? Porter? That is where it begins and ends.

What's wrong with it? Let's think about it shall we? Who is a more dangerous opponent - A guy who can punch or a guy who can't? It's cringeworthy you even try and deflect it. Khan hasn't fought many big punchers other than Maidana and there's a reason for that.

Khan fans coming to the rescue of featherfists

Power don't mean nothing doe.