Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Brook: Me and Thurman Are Best Fights For Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by MisanthropicNY View Post
    Thurman is the only one who fights bums because he has to or else he'd be more inactive than he wants to be...

    Thurman would KO Brook and Khan although Brook would have a better shot at surviving because he actually runs and holds more often and better than Khan...

    It doesn't matter though because Pacquiao will KO Khan or Brook next anyway...so one of the two will have his career ended...
    Brook is still unbeaten, why should a loss against Mayweather end his career?
    It has not even ended Marquez career who was much older at that Point, or Miguel Cottos. At the end of the day you have not much to lose against Floyd because you are expected to lose anyway.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jim Tom View Post
      Based on track record Amir Khan is way ahead of Brook and Thurman. Brook only faced one half decent opponent in Shawn Porter. Thurman only faced Guererro. Khan has been in with a peak Garcia and Peterson. At that time Khan faced them I dont think Thurman or Brook would have won against them either. Khan has been in with Maidana, yes Maidana wasnt as good as he is now but no way Brook would have gone 12 rounds with Maidana. Give Khan his props, he doesnt deserve the Mayweather fight but he has more rights than Brook who has only faced bums.
      How can one post be so wrong.
      Reading that post pains me!

      1 Thurman beats Garcia
      2 Porter is very good
      3 Brook goes 12 with Maidana

      Comment


      • Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
        Khan battered Maidana, dropped him and Floyd needed two attempts to beat him

        Khan beat Julio Diaz, Porter needed two attempts to beat him

        Khans is therefore better than Floyd

        ^^^We can all make ****ty arguments to favor one boxer or another

        but lets look at Brooks resume, he has one notable win in some 30 plus fights

        Khan has too many to list

        Thurman has been fighting decent boxers consistently

        You can say what you want about Khan, he's been in the ring with solid competition

        Brook had a chance to fight Devon, he had a chance to fight Bradley, and he chose not to fight them

        You can talk about rankings, and paper titles, but list Brooks opponents and have a good laugh
        Smh. I dont think you have a clue about this sport.

        Khan and Devon are on the same level regardless of Khan beating him what you think about that comment??

        Algieri whooped ur boys @$$, hes not top level

        Comment


        • Fans would expect to see this two (Brook and Thurman) fight each other after their respective fights, which are not far apart. They should have no excuse in making the fight happen. Let's see who ducks who.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by wlliam View Post
            Smh. I dont think you have a clue about this sport.

            Khan and Devon are on the same level regardless of Khan beating him what you think about that comment??

            Algieri whooped ur boys @$$, hes not top level
            So given Brook got his ass whooped by Carson Jones, i guess he's on Brooks level? LMAO

            Devon might of had issues dealing with Khan, but there are boxers he would beat more convincingly than Khan would

            Its all about styles, Devon is on the same level as Porter, it just depends on who you are and how you deal with Devons and Porters style. There aint a huge talent gap between Devon and Porter, look at their resumes.

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP