Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Brook: Me and Thurman Are Best Fights For Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Salim_Shady View Post
    People forget that Maidana was the most feared in the divison and had a 90% KO percentage. A bit like Thurman now, if Amir doesnt get the Mayweather fight, I wouldnt be surprised to see him derail Thurman.
    Thurman knocks him the f#ck out!

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
      This coming from the guy who says Kelly has a better resume than Triple G

      ******* Dan and Stinky Gavin
      I don't put people on ignore so I'll just allow you to continue to embarrass yourself in front of my very eyes. Responding and trying to reason with a spastic is an exercise in futility.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        I don't put people on ignore so I'll just allow you to continue to embarrass yourself in front of my very eyes. Responding and trying to reason with a spastic is an exercise in futility.
        Its good that u tapped out, the truth hurts

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
          Lol@ higher level

          Khan has been fighting at a high level since 2009.

          Porter and Devon are on the same level, regardless of Porter beating him.

          What level has Brook been fighting at consistently? Stepped up one time, got the win by the skin of his teeth. Then what? nothing

          There isnt much separating Khans last 3 opponents and Thurman last 3 opponents.
          Do you understand how to rate a fighter? There ratings are based on their competition, wins and losses. They win they get a bump, they lose they take a step back.Boxing ratings 101. So lets rate Brook, Thurman, Porter and Khanjob. Brook is rated higher than Porter bcuz he beat him. Porter beat Alexander. Khan beat Alexander also. Porter over devon gets a higher rating than Khan over Alexander bcuz there was a title on the line. And whenever a fighter loses his rating takes a hit, so Khan over Devon doesnt rate him higher than Brook or Porter. Thurman beat Guerrero for his rating, but its difficult to see where he stacks up against brook, porter but he does have an interim title.

          What i got: Brook > Thurman > Porter > Khan > Alexander

          Oh and Porter and Devon are on the same level regardless of Porter beating him!!??? were you being serious? ****** comment

          Khans been fightn at higher level since 09? Yeah up until Garcia KOd his fraudulent @$$ 3-4 yrs ago. Like i said, when a fighter loses his rating takes a hit..so when Garcia KOd Con, he was no longer a titlist, thats how title fights work..the winner is the Champ while the loser rebuilds. Khan is literally STILL rebuilding...he hasnt returned to the title scene since, where Brook and Thurman CURRENTLY are. Do u understand??
          Last edited by wlliam; 06-22-2015, 08:18 PM.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Heavyfist View Post
            Yea, but it's really strange when no one is talking about Khan at all, when the discussion is about GGG and Froch, that someone would keep insisting on bringing Khan into it.

            And downplaying Khan is completely different from having racist Khan hissy fits for no apparent reason. And Khan has had good competition. He hasn't won all those fights, but he's fought lots of good ranked competition. I do think there are at least a few fighters at Welter that would beat him. Hopefully, Khan Brook happens if he doesn't get FLoyd.

            GGG is trying to fight the best competition, you can't really fault him for the way things have gone down. He's trying to fight Cotto, Canelo, and Froch. We know this.
            But Khan doe i gotcha, i see things similar. Unfortunately, due to lack of fights being made, Khans reluctance to take Brooks offer or take on Thurman, we have to resort to debating who has beaten the best bums recently instead of finding out who is the better guy the ol' fashioned way.

            Completely agree about GGG.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              Like I said, all you can do is laugh. You're no longer a poster to be taken at all seriously
              "Porter and Devon are on the same level regardless of Porter beating him"

              that was an epic statement though, one for the books.
              Last edited by wlliam; 06-22-2015, 08:50 PM.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by wlliam View Post
                Do you understand how to rate a fighter? There ratings are based on their competition, wins and losses. They win they get a bump, they lose they take a step back.Boxing ratings 101. So lets rate Brook, Thurman, Porter and Khanjob. Brook is rated higher than Porter bcuz he beat him. Porter beat Alexander. Khan beat Alexander also. Porter over devon gets a higher rating than Khan over Alexander bcuz there was a title on the line. And whenever a fighter loses his rating takes a hit, so Khan over Devon doesnt rate him higher than Brook or Porter. Thurman beat Guerrero for his rating, but its difficult to see where he stacks up against brook, porter but he does have an interim title.

                What i got: Brook > Thurman > Porter > Khan > Alexander

                Oh and Porter and Devon are on the same level regardless of Porter beating him!!??? were you being serious? ****** comment

                Khans been fightn at higher level since 09? Yeah up until Garcia KOd his fraudulent @$$ 3-4 yrs ago. Like i said, when a fighter loses his rating takes a hit..so when Garcia KOd Con, he was no longer a titlist, thats how title fights work..the winner is the Champ while the loser rebuilds. Khan is literally STILL rebuilding...he hasnt returned to the title scene since, where Brook and Thurman CURRENTLY are. Do u understand??
                Khan battered Maidana, dropped him and Floyd needed two attempts to beat him

                Khan beat Julio Diaz, Porter needed two attempts to beat him

                Khans is therefore better than Floyd

                ^^^We can all make ****ty arguments to favor one boxer or another

                but lets look at Brooks resume, he has one notable win in some 30 plus fights

                Khan has too many to list

                Thurman has been fighting decent boxers consistently

                You can say what you want about Khan, he's been in the ring with solid competition

                Brook had a chance to fight Devon, he had a chance to fight Bradley, and he chose not to fight them

                You can talk about rankings, and paper titles, but list Brooks opponents and have a good laugh
                Last edited by FrankieBruno; 06-22-2015, 09:04 PM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  I think Thurman might give Mayweather a good go. Brook however, is a no go.

                  We're either seeing Mayweather-Thurman or Mayweather-Khan, at this stage I really don't know who Mayweather is eying next, just stating my opinion. Announcements are close to the dates though, we're heading to July and Mayweather would have two months for training camp.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
                    Lol@ higher level

                    Khan has been fighting at a high level since 2009.

                    Porter and Devon are on the same level, regardless of Porter beating him.

                    What level has Brook been fighting at consistently? Stepped up one time, got the win by the skin of his teeth. Then what? nothing

                    There isnt much separating Khans last 3 opponents and Thurman last 3 opponents.
                    That's literally the most ******ed thing I've ever heard.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
                      This coming from the guy who says Kelly has a better resume than Triple G

                      ******* Dan and Stinky Gavin
                      You've gone full ****** lately. As in, completely full ******.

                      Dirk is right. How the hell can you say someone is on the same level when they were beaten easily?

                      It's like me saying Martin Murray is on the same level as GGG because he's competed with Martinez and Sturm.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP