Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter on Froch, N'dam-Lemieux, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by NEETzsche View Post
    apparently so, which would be a good plan imo. but it doesn't solve the problem of who golovkin can fight in september. nsb will explode if it's chudinov or some other no-mark in the wba top 15
    even though its a garbage fight, and GGG mauls him inside of 6, if there's no better option I'd be ok with GGG-Lara.

    If nothing else, at least it forever shuts up all the "but but but Lara doe" puppets around here........

    Comment


    • #12
      I wouldn't mind Lemieux but I think Oscar is holding him for Canelo

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
        even though its a garbage fight, and GGG mauls him inside of 6, if there's no better option I'd be ok with GGG-Lara.

        If nothing else, at least it forever shuts up all the "but but but Lara doe" puppets around here........
        i'd love it to be lara but i doubt hbo or pbc would ok that, and it's not as if he's ranked by the wba at 160 lbs and can force the issue

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
          isnt Gary Shaw working on doing Johnson-Heiland as an eliminator?
          Could be but idr if the WBC had ordered the eliminator or not.





          Comment


          • #15
            Fight Lara , then , why not .

            Hit and not be hit .

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
              Could be but idr if the WBC had ordered the eliminator or not.





              if GGG ends up having to take Johnson I bet you would be right here hollering "haha look at GGG fighting another nobody who is Johnson?? lolololol" with 50 ****** emoji like this
              Last edited by OnePunch; 06-16-2015, 03:47 PM.

              Comment


              • #17
                It would be a huge let down if GGG ends up fighting Heiland or Johnson in September.
                • DeGale wouldn't be as big as Froch, but it'd still be the biggest fight GGG could realistically get (if Hearn was willing).
                • Lara would be a good fight just because he's an established name and out of Texas.
                • Lemieux/N'Dam winner will want to milk the IBF title before handing it over to Golovkin.
                • Lemieux/N'Dam loser - most likely canidate, assuming their not destroyed by the winner.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Execute Lara at 160 then fight the Canelo-Cotto winner.

                  A Monroe rematch is utterly useless.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Hey, why not fight DelaHoya? He wanted some right?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                      Execute Lara at 160 then fight the Canelo-Cotto winner.

                      A Monroe rematch is utterly useless.
                      Canelo-Cotto winner wouldnt be until next spring at the earliest, if ever. Even if step aside deal is reached, winner likely vacates instead of fighting GGG.

                      GGG would most likely want to fight in sept/oct and then again dec/jan. He wont want to sit from sept all the way to next may

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP