Even if they're not booked kell will want no part of them. You said Devon and chavez will have an eliminator. So his next mando is gonna either be a guy porter and khan already beat. Or a guy thurman and tim already beat.
But they booked fights first. Why is it that Kell wants no part of them? They obviously wanted no part of Kell because they booked fights knowing that The Champ was fighting in August.
And I don't get what you're laughing about either. We know your man crush doesn't fight mandatories and your head doesn't emerge from his rectal passage very much but other champions do have mandatory obligations in boxing. Are you aware of this? Brook doesn't get to choose who his mandatory is hence the word "mandatory" - look it up. You're American so it might be too big a word for you.
Brook's next mandatory isn't due till next year anyway so hopefully one of these "top contenders" you are desperate for him to fight don't duck him again by booking fights before his next date.
Bradley and Thurman clearly wanted no part of Brook in August. Hell Bradley turned down Rios (the guy Brook you are trashing Brook for fighting) and he turned down an IBF eliminator against Porter (a guy Brook schooled in your home country).
And I'm sure dirk was justifying khan fighting devon too I never said it was a good win so not sure what your point is. Kell sure is going for the gusto and cementing his legacy eh. 10 years fighting nothing but the best
Khan vs Alexander was a decent fight between two top 10 welterweights. But it was nothing more than that.
If Kell ends up fighting Alexander, he should get the same credit Khan got for that same win.
Comment