Comments Thread For: Khan: I Know I'd Beat Brook, I Won't Be a C*nt About It

[BoxingJunkie]

Yeah, why fight Brook when you can fight guys with no power for better money, even though "It's not about the money"

Exactly! Khan is full of crap! He would make FAARR more money fighting Brook in an all U.K. showdown rather than fighting Algeri yet he fights feather fist Algeri anyway?

Khan's exact reasoning for not fighting Brook is what Mayweather should use against him. Personally I don't like Khan and I hope he is forced into fighting Brook.

[Box-Office]

Because the two situations were completely different. Do you really think there was 6 or 7 million on the table for Hatton to fight Junior Witter at any point in their careers?

American TV weren't interested in Junior Witter for years because the last time they showed him was against Zab Judah and he completely stunk the place out. American TV showed Brook's fight against Dan ffs. HBO are showing his next fight against Rios. Froch-Groves II did great numbers on HBO as would Brook-Khan.

By the time Witter even won a world title, Hatton was setting up a fight with Jose Luis Castillo - who was faded but ranked in the top 10 P4P at the time and a huge name. It would be sort of like if Khan fought Marquez now - I'd be fine with that fight because Marquez is a bigger name than Kell Brook.

But he's not. He's fighting Chris Algieri's. Which did absolutely nothing for him except make him look **** average and make him lose support.

I don't understand where you got the American TV having no interest part. Especially when you question me bragging about Amir's American ratings (although that's arguing the case for Mayweather). Also Showtime broadcasted his defense against Bradley, so against the right guy he would be on U.S. TV not that it is relevant because it is a British super fight, but if Bradley-Witter was good enough, so will be Hatton-Witter for a World title too.


Is there a rule that it has to be 6/7 million for domestic fights? Again, Hatton could get Lazcano or Maussa in England, so he could certainly get Witter.

As for Brook on U.S. tv, well you got to give Eddie credit where it's due. The guy does his lads justice.

In a nut shell I believe Hatton was not nearly given the grilling as Khan is for ducking. He would've been made to look very ordinary. Something he was anyways.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I don't understand where you got the American TV having no interest part. Especially when you question me bragging about Amir's American ratings (although that's arguing the case for Mayweather).Also Showtime broadcasted his defense against Bradley, so against the right guy he would be on U.S. TV not that it is relevant because it is a British super fight, but if Bradley-Witter was good enough, so will be Hatton-Witter for a World title too.

Bradley-Witter was years after the Judah fight. When Witter won a world title and actually put in a good performance against Vivian Harris. And he was fighting an American. Before that, American TV weren't interested in Junior Witter. It would have just been a domestic level fight - Brook vs. Khan clearly has global interest.

Is there a rule that it has to be 6/7 million for domestic fights? Again, Hatton could get Lazcano or Maussa in England, so he could certainly get Witter.

Witter wasn't a world champion when Hatton fought Maussa who was a world champion. Lazcano was a comeback fight after Hatton just got KO'd by Mayweather. Obviously wasn't going to go straight into a World title fight after that.

Who has Amir fought after he's been cleaned out? Osin Faigan and Carlos Molina if my memory serves me correctly.

As for Brook on U.S. tv, well you got to give Eddie credit where it's due. The guy does his lads justice.

In a nut shell I believe Hatton was not nearly given the grilling as Khan is for ducking. He would've been made to look very ordinary. Something he was anyways.

That's because he doesn't deserve the same grilling because it's a completely different magnitude of situation and trust me, there were plenty of people who gave Hatton **** for "ducking" Witter.

Khan wasn't given any stick for not fighting Brook when Brook was a nobody so why would Hatton be? It's like slagging off Khan for not fighting John Murray

[thack]

Bradley-Witter was years after the Judah fight. When Witter won a world title and actually put in a good performance against Vivian Harris. And he was fighting an American. Before that, American TV weren't interested in Junior Witter. It would have just been a domestic level fight - Brook vs. Khan clearly has global interest.



Witter wasn't a world champion when Hatton fought Maussa who was a world champion. Lazcano was a comeback fight after Hatton just got KO'd by Mayweather. Obviously wasn't going to go straight into a World title fight after that.

Who has Amir fought after he's been cleaned out? Osin Faigan and Carlos Molina if my memory serves me correctly.



That's because he doesn't deserve the same grilling because it's a completely different magnitude of situation and trust me, there were plenty of people who gave Hatton **** for "ducking" Witter.

Khan wasn't given any stick for not fighting Brook so why would Hatton be? It's like slagging off Khan for not fighting John Murray

Well that seems to have got rid of him.......I hope !

[cuzzlo]

I'm a Brit and I can tell you Khan looked dreadful against Algeri. Brook crumbled Porter and especially Frankie Gavin. Khan does not really want that fight now. Brook is concussive.

[Mike D]

It's crazy man, once upon a time I was a huge Khan fan. HUGE. Like he was right up there near the top for me. But dude has become a huge, annoying ass diva. It's one thing if you're Floyd Mayweather and you're a diva. Floyd earned that right. But Amir f**king Khan? Lmfaooooo

The f**k outta here. I can't stand the guy anymore. Can't believe I'm about to say this...but I might actually pull for Floyd if he fights him.

[Yaconcha]

ok, there you have it. another complete **** of a statement from the "superdooperstar bumplug". lets disect this for what it REALLY means.
first of all, the bum is correct, he doesnt need kell because he really cant cope with another loss and his excuse is more losing to kell rather than kell not being a name despite the fact that kell is unbeaten and had more unbeaten fights and total fights than her aaaaand he is a current world champion which happens to be what the bum always said he wanted to face and also said when kell has a world title then ask me. scared of kell? no but, scared of losing to kell....absolutely a big huge fat yes...obviously.
contradiction:the bum said she only wanted the big names but claims its not about the money...big names = money and she "dont wanna be a **** about it"? this is a suggestion that we all must be ****s. surely not?
kell brook would and could fill wembley or old trafford with ease and the bolton 8itch could fill a pi55 bag so i fail to see where or why the bum would avoid kell brook.
kell brook: world champion.unbeaten.genuine british star with massive likeability here in the u.k and a big draw in the british boxing scene and i think further a field. definately becoming a big player.
whats left for greedy boy? the dog ends......thats how it will all be told over the next couple of years.
i only hope that floyd mayweather picks kell brook for his next foe OR atleast kell brook before retiring without giving king nobody the chance for money. as i said before, its fackin embarrassing when they say "british superstar" the bum is nothing here and its not even laughable anymore.
there are many true british fighters who dont behave like this fackin ****** **** ox joey fack witt. im goin for a poo.

[Hype job]

ok, there you have it. another complete **** of a statement from the "superdooperstar bumplug". lets disect this for what it REALLY means.
first of all, the bum is correct, he doesnt need kell because he really cant cope with another loss and his excuse is more losing to kell rather than kell not being a name despite the fact that kell is unbeaten and had more unbeaten fights and total fights than her aaaaand he is a current world champion which happens to be what the bum always said he wanted to face and also said when kell has a world title then ask me. scared of kell? no but, scared of losing to kell....absolutely a big huge fat yes...obviously.
contradiction:the bum said she only wanted the big names but claims its not about the money...big names = money and she "dont wanna be a **** about it"? this is a suggestion that we all must be ****s. surely not?
kell brook would and could fill wembley or old trafford with ease and the bolton 8itch could fill a pi55 bag so i fail to see where or why the bum would avoid kell brook.
kell brook: world champion.unbeaten.genuine british star with massive likeability here in the u.k and a big draw in the british boxing scene and i think further a field. definately becoming a big player.
whats left for greedy boy? the dog ends......thats how it will all be told over the next couple of years.
i only hope that floyd mayweather picks kell brook for his next foe OR atleast kell brook before retiring without giving king nobody the chance for money. as i said before, its fackin embarrassing when they say "british superstar" the bum is nothing here and its not even laughable anymore.
there are many true british fighters who dont behave like this fackin ****** **** ox joey fack witt. im goin for a poo.

[Yaconcha]

Bradley-Witter was years after the Judah fight. When Witter won a world title and actually put in a good performance against Vivian Harris. And he was fighting an American. Before that, American TV weren't interested in Junior Witter. It would have just been a domestic level fight - Brook vs. Khan clearly has global interest.



Witter wasn't a world champion when Hatton fought Maussa who was a world champion. Lazcano was a comeback fight after Hatton just got KO'd by Mayweather. Obviously wasn't going to go straight into a World title fight after that.

Who has Amir fought after he's been cleaned out? Osin Faigan and Carlos Molina if my memory serves me correctly.



That's because he doesn't deserve the same grilling because it's a completely different magnitude of situation and trust me, there were plenty of people who gave Hatton **** for "ducking" Witter.

Khan wasn't given any stick for not fighting Brook when Brook was a nobody so why would Hatton be? It's like slagging off Khan for not fighting John Murray

dirk, khan is just a benefits scrounger, nothing more.

[Yaconcha]

soooo....what are you saying? pacman caught floyd with a cuff round the ear ole? what was that like...two of the three he landed overall? ****.
yup.....just a hypejob.