Khan is being a complete **** doe.
Comments Thread For: Khan: I Know I'd Beat Brook, I Won't Be a C*nt About It
Collapse
-
-
-
-
I agree Khan-Brook is bigger, but Hatton-Witter was a World level fight as well. Just not the same as the former, but would've been very big in England.Bradley-Witter was years after the Judah fight. When Witter won a world title and actually put in a good performance against Vivian Harris. And he was fighting an American. Before that, American TV weren't interested in Junior Witter. It would have just been a domestic level fight - Brook vs. Khan clearly has global interest.
I don't get what Khan-Brook being bigger has anything to do with Hatton-Witter. Both needed to happen. In both cases the guys are ducking/ed although one gets called on it.
If anything Witter actually went the traditional route winning all belts where as Brook made a name off Khan.
No, but Juan Urango, a Colombian in U.S. was any better? Witter was the WBC champ at that time and like I've said if Showtime gave him another look for Bradley then HBO could've done the same for Hatton.Witter wasn't a world champion when Hatton fought Maussa who was a world champion. Lazcano was a comeback fight after Hatton just got KO'd by Mayweather. Obviously wasn't going to go straight into a World title fight after that.
Who has Amir fought after he's been cleaned out? Osin Faigan and Carlos Molina if my memory serves me correctly.
Murray-Khan was a British title level rivalry. In the case of Hatton-Witter both were World champs and it was a lot more doable than Urango as mentioned.That's because he doesn't deserve the same grilling because it's a completely different magnitude of situation and trust me, there were plenty of people who gave Hatton **** for "ducking" Witter.
Khan wasn't given any stick for not fighting Brook when Brook was a nobody so why would Hatton be? It's like slagging off Khan for not fighting John Murray
If you can't hold your own then feel free to p1ss off instead of hanging off of other people's posts.Last edited by Box-Office; 06-04-2015, 12:52 AM.Comment
-
The only time it was a "world level fight" was when Witter finally won a "world title". By which time Hatton was setting up fights with Castillo and subsequently Floyd Mayweather.
Juan Urango was the IBF champion. Castillo was fighting Herman Ndgodgou on the undercard. It was a set up for the Hatton-Castillo fight assuming both won.
Witter wasn't a factor as Hatton had already set these fights up before Witter finally won a world title.
Maybe you weren't watching boxing at the time but i'm always happy to educate you.
If Khan had been fighting a champion or setting up a big fight or doing anything to further his career, I'd say fair enough. But what direction was Chris Algieri ever going to take his career? Even if he stopped him, no one would really care. Instead he looked like complete **** having turned down 5 times more money to fight a champion in Kell Brook.Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 06-04-2015, 01:22 AM.Comment
-
That's all in hindsight. If Hatton wanted it it would've happened. It was there to be made. Witter was a World champ, a fellow Brit and Ricky being cash cow he surely could've made it happen. Again, all in hindsight. My main point is that Hatton is as guilty as is Khan. The latter being bigger than the former is a hollow argument given both are independent events.The only time it was a "world level fight" was when Witter finally won a "world title". By which time Hatton was setting up fights with Castillo and subsequently Floyd Mayweather.
Juan Urango was the IBF champion. Castillo was fighting Herman Ndgodgou on the undercard. It was a set up for the Hatton-Castillo fight assuming both won.
Witter wasn't a factor as Hatton had already set these fights up before Witter finally won a world title.
Maybe you weren't watching boxing at the time but i'm always happy to educate you.
If Khan had been fighting a champion or setting up a big fight or doing anything to further his career, I'd say fair enough. But what direction was Chris Algieri ever going to take his career? Even if he stopped him, no one would really care. Instead he looked like complete **** having turned down 5 times more money to fight a champion in Kell Brook.
Rrrrright! I'm not doing ACCA, but thanks!Last edited by Box-Office; 06-04-2015, 03:55 AM.Comment
-
You just can't acept the fact that khunt khan is not as popular as you so want him to be can you?That's all in hindsight. If Hatton wanted it it would've happened. It was there to be made. Witter was a World champ, a fellow Brit and Ricky being cash cow he surely could've made it happen. Again, all in hindsight. My main point is that Hatton is as guilty as is Khan. The latter being bigger than the former is a hollow argument given both are independent events.
Rrrrright! I'm not doing ACCA, but thanks!
Find your balls and face reality.
Oh wait, your balls are being tightly held in khunt khan's sweaty little palm...Comment
-
'Why should I give him the opportunity'? LOL, Khan hasn't held a world title in nearly 3 years. Brook just made his second title defence and is fighting in the 02 in London, an 18,000 arena.
Brook wants the fight because it's a huge fight, huge money, huge ratings, a domestic blockbuster in the UK with global implications for the world title.
Khan is looking to cash out with Floyd, pure and simple.Comment
-
Comment
Comment