Comments Thread For: Shaw: Cotto Beat 'Shot, One-Legged Fighter' in Martinez

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PR ESQ.
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 1285
    • 63
    • 64
    • 7,778

    #31
    Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
    GGG's resume is ****, Geale is the best name on that resume. I never said Geale is a great fight for Cotto, it's what it is a B level opponent. Where did I say it was such a great fight? It's certainly better than Kirkland, did you even know he hadn't fought in 14+ months and didn't have his normal trainer? It doesn't even matter who trained him, he has NO ****ING chin, no technique and just no skill other than ability to get knocked out. The guy is a D class fighter, period.

    I know Trout lost to Cotto, so what? He's a B class fighter and Cotto lost to won. He lost to another B class fighter in Margarito... He's still an A class fighter because he's beaten A class fighters, Canelo has yet to do that and so have GGG. Why even bring up Lara, seriously? Cotto was busy fighting the MW champion of the world, not someone that never had a title. Why even bring up Lara, did you not see the names I stated on Cotto's resume? Each one I listed would beat Lara and therein lies the problem with Canelo fans. They think the win over Lara is something special, it was nothing special at all, it was a B fighter he looked like **** against.

    Still trying to defend that Kirkland victory? Sounds like a Canelo fan. The wins that aren't good are the best wins ever if Canelo did it lol. I've yet to come up with an excuse for Cotto losing to Trout, yet, you're making excuses for justifying Kirkland as an opponent. "Yeah, he was KO'd in one but he had all these problems." What? Kirkland has one problem he sucks, the end.
    Lara gifted that fight to their idol yet they won't acknowledge. That's the irony of it all...

    Comment

    • Beater_of_ass
      male ass that is
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 7172
      • 281
      • 144
      • 13,666

      #32
      Originally posted by PR ESQ.
      yep Trout really signifies a defining resume.
      Seriously man, Trout and Lara is HOF worthy, first ballot. Canelo should retire he has nothing else to prove. What a ****ing joke lol.

      Comment

      • JJRod
        Unified Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 7675
        • 267
        • 326
        • 43,150

        #33
        Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
        GGG's resume is ****, Geale is the best name on that resume. I never said Geale is a great fight for Cotto, it's what it is a B level opponent. Where did I say it was such a great fight? It's certainly better than Kirkland, did you even know he hadn't fought in 14+ months and didn't have his normal trainer? It doesn't even matter who trained him, he has NO ****ING chin, no technique and just no skill other than ability to get knocked out. The guy is a D class fighter, period.

        I know Trout lost to Cotto, so what? He's a B class fighter and Cotto lost to won. He lost to another B class fighter in Margarito... He's still an A class fighter because he's beaten A class fighters, Canelo has yet to do that and so have GGG. Why even bring up Lara, seriously? Cotto was busy fighting the MW champion of the world, not someone that never had a title. Why even bring up Lara, did you not see the names I stated on Cotto's resume? Each one I listed would beat Lara and therein lies the problem with Canelo fans. They think the win over Lara is something special, it was nothing special at all, it was a B fighter he looked like **** against.

        Still trying to defend that Kirkland victory? Sounds like a Canelo fan. The wins that aren't good are the best wins ever if Canelo did it lol. I've yet to come up with an excuse for Cotto losing to Trout, yet, you're making excuses for justifying Kirkland as an opponent. "Yeah, he was KO'd in one but he had all these problems." What? Kirkland has one problem he sucks, the end.

        The irony. Talking crap about a fighters opponent (trout) all the while defending to death the guy who lost to him.

        "Yeah my fighter lost to a fighter Canelo beat, but but but Cotto still a class and Canelo is crap. Canelo doesn't have good wins"

        What a pathetic fan boy you are.

        Comment

        • bigjavi973
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2013
          • 24007
          • 759
          • 1,480
          • 1,236,071

          #34
          Originally posted by ThatDude44
          This will be a tough fight , catch weight or not. As far as Martinez, he talked AAAAAALL that *****. I don't wanna hear any excuses. Hell, Martinez isn't even giving excuses so why should anybody else. Cotto was loved during the Floyd fight and once he beat the guy he was accused of ducking (Martinez) all that changed, kinda like Garcia when he beat Matthyse. People are funny.

          Comment

          • skinnystev
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 3963
            • 110
            • 0
            • 28,699

            #35
            cotton can't be gaining any fans with this catchweight crap

            Comment

            • Beater_of_ass
              male ass that is
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 7172
              • 281
              • 144
              • 13,666

              #36
              Originally posted by jrrod02
              The irony. Talking crap about a fighters opponent (trout) all the while defending to death the guy who lost to him.

              "Yeah my fighter lost to a fighter Canelo beat, but but but Cotto still a class and Canelo is crap. Canelo doesn't have good wins"

              What a pathetic fan boy you are.
              I'm not defending Trout at all. I said he's a B class fighter Cotto lost to... How is that defending? It was a bad loss for Cotto, **** happens. You're the one trying to make it out as some big win. You make excuses for Kirkland well how about the excuses for Trout and Lara. Lara won that fight and Trout would have but open scoring (and bad scoring) ruined any chance he had.

              I don't see what you fail to understand. I understand you have Canelo's nuts in your throat, but you're blinded by them at the same time. He's best wins, are Trout and Lara. Cotto's are Mosley and Martinez... We didn't even bring up how they did against Floyd, that's all the proof you need to see who is an A class and who the B class fighter is.

              Comment

              • bojangles1987
                bo jungle
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 41118
                • 1,326
                • 357
                • 63,028

                #37
                Clearly. It's mostly just Cotto fans that deny it.

                Comment

                • Beater_of_ass
                  male ass that is
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 7172
                  • 281
                  • 144
                  • 13,666

                  #38
                  Originally posted by bojangles1987
                  Clearly. It's mostly just Cotto fans that deny it.
                  Sergio must be a Cotto fan.

                  Comment

                  • PRBOXINGCOTTO
                    PRBOXINGCOTTO
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 8566
                    • 266
                    • 147
                    • 15,057

                    #39
                    stop crying shaw everyone picked Martinez to beat cotto even with 1 leg the doctors cleared him he was fine stop making excuses cotto is going to beat geale ass

                    Comment

                    • Cuauhtémoc1520
                      Head Mexican in Charge
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 20824
                      • 1,666
                      • 569
                      • 35,996

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
                      I'm not defending Trout at all. I said he's a B class fighter Cotto lost to... How is that defending? It was a bad loss for Cotto, **** happens. You're the one trying to make it out as some big win. You make excuses for Kirkland well how about the excuses for Trout and Lara. Lara won that fight and Trout would have but open scoring (and bad scoring) ruined any chance he had.

                      I don't see what you fail to understand. I understand you have Canelo's nuts in your throat, but you're blinded by them at the same time. He's best wins, are Trout and Lara. Cotto's are Mosley and Martinez... We didn't even bring up how they did against Floyd, that's all the proof you need to see who is an A class and who the B class fighter is.
                      So what will you say when Canelo beats Cotto? I think they both are terrific fighters, and I don't need to take a side like you little boys that have never been in a ring, or a boxing gym for that matter.

                      To say Canelo is a B fighter is as idiotic as saying Cotto is. Both are fantastic fighters and I think we are all in for a great fight. I have to give it to the younger, stronger, bigger fighter in Canelo but if Cotto wins, I wouldn't be surprised.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP