Who would enhance Mayweather's legacy most? Khan or Brook?

[SeekDaGreat]

I voted about the same. Neither of them really do anything for Mayweathers legacy. It was defined when he beat Pacquiao. The show is over. This last fight is simply an obligation.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Sooo, now you're a 16 year old middle-class white TMT fan?

I must say Inkanymaba, your creativity is impressive

Good spot

[Caught Square]

Did Henry Armstrong make that jump

The jump from being top 40 of all time to number 6 with one victory? Not that i'm aware of.

[aAgger]

What a womanly fanboy response only a Khanturd could ever come up with. Garcia literally smashed the living sht out of Khan on top of beating another guy that beat Khan, as well as Matthysse - who alone would be the best guy Khan ever beat BY FAR. That's just on top of his other wins and he's undefeated + better known than Khan AND does better ratings

By the standards you just set, Garcia should easily be the first choice for Mayweather.

His resume literally smokes Khan's.

If you actually saw the fight and the punch stats, it was Khan who was beating the living crap out of Garcia up until the lucky sucker punch. As for Peterson, the punch stats show Khan beat Peterson more convincingly than Garcia did (many believe Peterson deserved the win over Garcia), despite the fact Khan fought the much tougher illegal PEDerson version. The only reason Khan lost is because of the hometown referee's 2 silly point deductions. And finally, Matthysse is nothing compared to Khan's complete shut-out victories against against Judah and Alexander, both of whom already beat Matthysse. Overall, Garcia has only ever had 4 convincing UD/KO victories against world champions, whereas Khan has had 9 convincing UD/KO victories against world champions. Objectively, Garcia's resume doesn't come close to Khan's resume.

And once again, Garcia isn't even a welterweight. First let the guy move up to welterweight, and at least fight a WW fight or two, before naming him as a potential Floyd candidate. I know you must have a burning hatred for Khan, but stop being so childish and irrational. Naming a LWW who has never fought at WW before as the top potential candidate for the WW king, that's just plain delusional.

[sicko]

Neither! Legacy is at it peak, really doesn't matter who he fights in September to be honest.

[Larry the boss]

Neither do anything for his legacy,But Brook has a title and that would add to his title count

[baya]

If you actually saw the fight and the punch stats, it was Khan who was beating the living crap out of Garcia up until the lucky sucker punch. As for Peterson, the punch stats show Khan beat Peterson more convincingly than Garcia did (many believe Peterson deserved the win over Garcia), despite the fact Khan fought the much tougher illegal PEDerson version. The only reason Khan lost is because of the hometown referee's 2 silly point deductions. And finally, Matthysse is nothing compared to Khan's complete shut-out victories against against Judah and Alexander, both of whom already beat Matthysse. Overall, Garcia has only ever had 4 convincing UD/KO victories against world champions, whereas Khan has had 9 convincing UD/KO victories against world champions. Objectively, Garcia's resume doesn't come close to Khan's resume.

And once again, Garcia isn't even a welterweight. First let the guy move up to welterweight, and at least fight a WW fight or two, before naming him as a potential Floyd candidate. I know you must have a burning hatred for Khan, but stop being so childish and irrational. Naming a LWW who has never fought at WW before as the top potential candidate for the WW king, that's just plain delusional.

shut the hell up. khan was never close to "beating the living crap" out of garcia.

[SkillspayBills]

Neither would enhance his legacy. He would just be beating someone who is pretty good.

[SalimShady1212]

shut the hell up. khan was never close to "beating the living crap" out of garcia.

So Angel was shouting "wake up Danny, he's picking you apart" for no reason. And those two cuts magically appeared on his face.

[DeadLikeMe]

So Angel was shouting "wake up Danny, he's picking you apart" for no reason. And those two cuts magically appeared on his face.

What is with this new trend of citing corner advice as some type of concrete evidence? You see fights where a guy is pitching a shutout into the late rounds and his corner will tell him he needs a knockout to win. Does that mean they're actually losing the fight? It's about motivation.