Who would enhance Mayweather's legacy most? Khan or Brook?

[LacedUp]

I didnt say your "dumb as sht" , i said youre saying dumb ****. Everyone in this thread told you that it doesnt matter who he fights next.

Youre the one making threads about floyd , not me. So dont get mad

I'm fully aware that his legacy is already set. Thanks for reminding me though. If you can't answer a simple question of who the best fight would be, then go to another thread.

I don't remember, but Bradley's actually good. He's been around the WW top 5 for about 4 years, holds wins over Pacquiao and Marquez so if he holds a world title it would be hard to consider anyone else undisputed when Bradley could dispute it with some credibility.

Sure - but Mayweather has lineage on Bradley now, so not sure that holds. But I guess some wouldn't consider him undisputed champ. But I would.

[HanzGruber]

That might very well be true, but that wasn't the question was it?
2

The IQ of these "fans"...

I said "no". I didn't answer the question doe

[FeFist]

Brook. Neither fighter would add to his legacy but a victory over Brook would see him retire as the undisputed champ.

[English Lion]

First of all, Mayweather has nothing left to prove, he did that when he beat Manny. Second of all Mayweather can't become undisputed champion because he threw the WBO belt away..(not that it matters, as again, He has nothing left to prove). Third and final point, Khan would add to Floyd's legacy more because, no one in America (except the hardcore fans) know who Brook is, and Brook has fought nobody except porter in a 35 fight career so far.

[LacedUp]

I said "no". I didn't answer the question doe

I was referring to the comment the middleweight title.

I'm not sure you can answer "no" to a question of "who would enhance his legacy more?" But anyway.

[HanzGruber]

I was referring to the comment the middleweight title.

I'm not sure you can answer "no" to a question of "who would enhance his legacy more?" But anyway.

You are a thick **** aren't you. And like they said he doesn't even have the wbo. So your main point on why brook is a good fight just went out the window

[LacedUp]

You are a thick **** aren't you. And like they said he doesn't even have the wbo. So your main point on why brook is a good fight just went out the window

Yes. Out of the two of us, I'm the thick one.

[Szef]

If Floyd hadn't vacated his titles I woulde've said Brook: unifying the WW division in their final fight would look impressive on anyone's resume.

Right now it's still Brook: undefeated champion.

[NEETzsche]

i'm gonna say brook because i think he is just beginning his run at the top, whereas it seems that khan will never win a major fight again

[BostonGuy]

I'd say Brook because it would be the harder of the two fights (Khan being the other). I think Brook gives Mayweather his toughest challenge and legacy wise it would look good for Floyd to go out on a tough fought win, rather hhan a points shutout victory against Khan.