Why not compare a prime Mayweather vs a prime SRL, not a 38 year old Mayweather to prime SRL?
Comments Thread For: Mancini: Mayweather Never Beats Sugar Ray Leonard!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
can we please stop this already?
It's ****ing ridiculous. Every damn week an old fighter comes out and says that "floyd wouldn't beat this hof-er" or "floyd doesn't beat that atg" or "floyd isn't tbe".
These guys were all boxers they should know the best that this whole "tbe" thing is only marketing, hence it's absolute senseless to argue with it or get upset about it.
The many people who bitching all the time about this "tbe" thing prove the best how effective this marketing really is.
This is just as senseless like when people bitching about andre ward being s.o.g. Becaue "how he dares to, blah-blah-blah..."
it's a fucking nickname guys, a fantasy name, don't take it literal.Comment
-
Comment
-
...Don't talk out your ass...mayweather would get owned by leonard.....obviously your still at schoolComment
-
How about we YouTube Sugar vs. Terry Norris, when Sugar was 35. Would that show us the skill level that Mayweather has at age 38 vs. Pacquiao? It's really hard to compare fighters of different eras, but let's ask ourselves...What was Sugar doing at age 38? What was his record at age 38?Comment
-
First of all, Floyd wouldn't have had the ballz to climb in the ring with those legends in their prime, period. Leonard, Hearns and Duran alone went up to challenge Marvin Hagler and between the four of them, had 9 epic bouts! Floyd doesn't have that kind of machismo. Not to mention all those legends hurt guys, they stalked down their opponent and knocked guys out; another reason Floyd would have avoided those guys. It's insulting any clown would try to compare Floyd to those legends.Comment
-
-
Fight would be a Rematch of Benitiz- Leonard...
Unlike Benitiz... FRAUD not getting close to Round 15!Comment
Comment