Its a tune up on paper, but if the Collazo that fought Berto shows up, this is a war. Stop hating.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Thurman-Collazo, Harrison-Nelson - July 11 on ESPN
Collapse
-
LMAO, Alexander isn't a WW but Guerrero is? Fugging ******ed ass Thurman fans. Stop embarrassing yourself.
If Alexander is such a soft opponent, than why is Thurman fighting Collazo instead of Alexander who wants to fight Thurman and is free?
If Collazo is such a terrible opponent for Khan, than how embarrassing is it for Thurman to fight him a year later?
In this case, Thurman is one of the least proven, and most over rated fighters in all of boxing, fighting Lightweights like Guerrero and super over the hill, Collazo who just got the shlt beaten out of him by Khan, being floored three times. And fugging 40 year old Bundu.
Thurman should be ashamed. Stop ducking Alexander son. Stop being a hypocrite son.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Heavyfist View PostIf you bother to read this thread then you would know the only reason Porter Broner is happening is because Thurman refused to fight Porter.
And as many people have already said, Alexander said he wants to fight Thurman. That is a much much much better fight. And Alex is free.
I don't think Thurman wants any of Alexander, as Alexander might just box circles around Thurman. I'd watch that fight. But Thurman appears comfortable being a coward and a hypocrite.
I think 40 year old slow Bundu really shows Thurman is over rated, and a boxer would school him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by heavyfist View Posteveryone is only booked up because thurman refused to fight porter. Originally, that was the fight that was meant to be made.
Thurman is straight up being a coward, and a hypocrite. He criticizes everyone else, yet he fights guerrero a career lightweight, and now collazo, khans leftovers.
Alexander already said he is willing to fight thurman. That's a far far better fight. And i have a feeling its a fight that thurman doesn't want, because i genuinely think, and i think thurman knows, alexander could definitely beat him.
And bundu shows thurman is overrated yet he got 12-0d.. are you people ***ing ******ed
Comment
-
Originally posted by Heavyfist View PostLMAO, Alexander isn't a WW but Guerrero is? Fugging ******ed ass Thurman fans. Stop embarrassing yourself.
If Alexander is such a soft opponent, than why is Thurman fighting Collazo instead of Alexander who wants to fight Thurman and is free?
If Collazo is such a terrible opponent for Khan, than how embarrassing is it for Thurman to fight him a year later?
In this case, Thurman is one of the least proven, and most over rated fighters in all of boxing, fighting Lightweights like Guerrero and super over the hill, Collazo who just got the shlt beaten out of him by Khan, being floored three times. And fugging 40 year old Bundu.
Thurman should be ashamed. Stop ducking Alexander son. Stop being a hypocrite son.
My goodness, you're an awful poster.
And Bundu exposed Thurman? I will say once again, that Bundu lost every round.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Heavyfist View PostLMAO, Alexander isn't a WW but Guerrero is? Fugging ******ed ass Thurman fans. Stop embarrassing yourself.
If Alexander is such a soft opponent, than why is Thurman fighting Collazo instead of Alexander who wants to fight Thurman and is free?
If Collazo is such a terrible opponent for Khan, than how embarrassing is it for Thurman to fight him a year later?
In this case, Thurman is one of the least proven, and most over rated fighters in all of boxing, fighting Lightweights like Guerrero and super over the hill, Collazo who just got the shlt beaten out of him by Khan, being floored three times. And fugging 40 year old Bundu.
Thurman should be ashamed. Stop ducking Alexander son. Stop being a hypocrite son.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Unsuspected View PostThurman may hold a title and keeps getting rave reviews but the fact is he's being matched carefully - pretty much the same as before he got that belt. Collazo is tough and has skills but is lacking one thing that will be huge: punching power. Anyone that has followed his career knows the Ortiz KO was an aberration. Ortiz was past peak and his chin had become suspect. Thurman will likely stop Luis as Collazo won't be able to get enough respect to keep him honest. Stylewise, Alexander and Porter would be major threats for Thurman and his people know it.
It stuns be that people are okay with Thurman fighting a lightweight in Guerrero, a 40 year old Bundu, and Collazo. But criticize Alexander for not being a real WW? WTF? How dumb do you have to be, to keep criticzing Alexander has not being a real WW, and praise Thurman for fighting Guerrero?
It's funny because Thurman is cherry picking already, at the beginning of his career, in his prime. He could be fighting Porter or Alexander, but instead chooses Collazo, a guy whose soul was taken by Khan.
Makes zero sense for anyone to defend this choice. Thurman is seriously being a hypocrite here. Warrior my ass.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scipio2009 View PostKhan is booked for May, Maidana is enjoying his time off, Broner is booked for June, and Garcia is likely going to be booked for a Philly defense of his 140 titles in July.
Who was honestly out there for Thurman to fight in the early summer, in Florida? GTFOH
Comment
-
Originally posted by Heavyfist View PostExactly.
It stuns be that people are okay with Thurman fighting a lightweight in Guerrero, a 40 year old Bundu, and Collazo. But criticize Alexander for not being a real WW? WTF? How dumb do you have to be, to keep criticzing Alexander has not being a real WW, and praise Thurman for fighting Guerrero?
It's funny because Thurman is cherry picking already, at the beginning of his career, in his prime. He could be fighting Porter or Alexander, but instead chooses Collazo, a guy whose soul was taken by Khan.
Makes zero sense for anyone to defend this choice. Thurman is seriously being a hypocrite here. Warrior my ass.
Comment
-
Comment