Lampley's Anti-Gatti List
Collapse
-
-
i gave you a post with "facts and clarity" and you told me to get back on track
are you biased for floyd mayweather? i think that's an easy enough question to answer.
here's another easy one: are you really going to deny that floyd was still in his prime at 147 lbs to suit your agenda that he "wasn't negative in his prime?"
you sound like a child. all of you do. you sound like children on a playground. it's embarrassing to see you reduced to this, because you do bring things to the table where the mayweather - pacquiao feud isn't concerned.Comment
-
Comment
-
Why would you only look at his career from that point? He's fought 14 times since moving up from 140. He made 8 defenses of his 130 title alone.
What I said was that he wasn't negative in his prime which, to me, was from 130-140. And he certainly wasn't. When you're talking about Mayweather simply potshotting, you're talking about a past prime version.Comment
-
You think Mayweather was closer to his prime at 147 than he was between 130-140.i gave you a post with "facts and clarity" and you told me to get back on track
are you biased for floyd mayweather? i think that's an easy enough question to answer.
here's another easy one: are you really going to deny that floyd was still in his prime at 147 lbs to suit your agenda that he "wasn't negative in his prime?"
you sound like a child. all of you do. you sound like children on a playground. it's embarrassing to see you reduced to this, because you do bring things to the table where the mayweather - pacquiao feud isn't concerned.
Bias? Miss me with your bull****.Comment
-
look, i love floyd mayweather. i really do.
i generally don't care for his fans any longer. just try and call it like it is, floyd fans. your guy isn't perfect, and every conceivable scenario in which one could fault mayweather isn't the product of some pacquiao driven agenda.
floyd is a great fighter. he's one of the best defensive fighters ever. he's the best i've seen personally on defense. prime whitaker is before my time. he's better than toney, hopkins, others.
he's negative when compared to most other great fighters. people generally find him more boring than past greats.Comment
-
i never said that. floyd mayweather is one of the best 130 lbers i've ever seen. if he wasn't in his prime then, i'd be frightened for his opponents. he had a rough fight at 135 with a terrific lightweight named jose luis castillo. again, he was still in is prime. he wasn't at 140 for long. he's been a welterweight for 10 years. and yes, he was in his prime for most of it.
the creation of straw man arguments is literally all you do.Comment
-

So Floyd was past prime versus oscar? Hahaha. This is ridiculous. He moved up in weight and realized his strategy needed to change. That doesn't make him past prime.Why would you only look at his career from that point? He's fought 14 times since moving up from 140. He made 8 defenses of his 130 title alone.
What I said was that he wasn't negative in his prime which, to me, was from 130-140. And he certainly wasn't. When you're talking about Mayweather simply potshotting, you're talking about a past prime version.Comment
Comment