Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Exposing the inaccuracy of Compubox

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I watched Floyd vs Castillo without commentary and gave it to mayweather . I thought the punch stats were way off . They were counting punches that hit Mayweather's arms

    Also, a fight is scored RBR not as whole.


    Round 1: Mayweather
    Round 2: Castillo
    Round 3: Mayweather
    Round 4: Mayweather
    Round 5: Mayweather
    Round 6: Castillo
    Round 7: Castillo
    Round 8: Castillo (point taken from Castillo for hitting on the break)
    Round 9: Castillo
    Round 10: Mayweather (point taken from Floyd for use of the elbow)
    Round 11: Mayweather
    Round 12: Mayweather

    114-112 Mayweather

    Comment


    • Title of thread: I'M a Pacfan, so trust me when I tell you what punches landed and did not land.

      No biased opinion here...lets move on folks, to the next Pacfan excuse

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Calabis View Post
        Title of thread: I'M a Pacfan, so trust me when I tell you what punches landed and did not land.

        No biased opinion here...lets move on folks, to the next Pacfan excuse
        no, he's broken down CompuBox inaccuracies before, this isn't the first time he's broke down punches landed each round.

        Calzaghe "landing" over 200 punches against Hopkins is a fine example. I've re watched that fight myself and counted landed punches, and while I don't have it in front of me, I believe I had Joe landing under 40 clean punches total. That's quite a massive difference from Compubox wouldn't you say?

        I've stated repeatedly over the years that if Compubox wants to be taken seriously they should have unofficial numbers during the fight (making it clear these numbers are done in real time and not accurate) and then after the fight watch the tapes, recount and publish their revised official findings.

        Comment


        • its sad that you are automatically labelled a hater because your opinion doesnt follow the majority opinion which is influenced by commentary

          it goes to show who is merely a fanboy who only watches fights involving floyd mayweather and then feel its a personal moral victory for them because he won.

          certain fans seem to think they won at life because mayweather beat pacquaio

          truth hurts

          sort your own life out

          Comment


          • "This ain't Olympic boxing doe"

            **Proceeds to score the fight based on punch count**


            Comment


            • So you haven't done it yet and you're gonna expose it's inaccuracy? So you pretty much just told us that you have an agenda and a predisposition to think it's wrong. Can't wait to see it.

              Comment


              • the only explanation for people diminishing daggums fine report and suggesting he is being inconsistent by saying it isnt olympic boxing is yet again, nuthuggery to an embarrassing degree

                or ignorance

                because daguum has, several times, in this thread said for example, " pac landed the better punches so i give him this round" . statements that completely refute the notion that daguum is scoring olympic style

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jas View Post
                  its sad that you are automatically labelled a hater because your opinion doesnt follow the majority opinion which is influenced by commentary

                  it goes to show who is merely a fanboy who only watches fights involving floyd mayweather and then feel its a personal moral victory for them because he won.

                  certain fans seem to think they won at life because mayweather beat pacquaio

                  truth hurts

                  sort your own life out
                  Not only the compubox is inaccurate but the commentary influenced. Never mind what ppl saw with there own eyes as per you.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
                    no, he's broken down CompuBox inaccuracies before, this isn't the first time he's broke down punches landed each round.

                    Calzaghe "landing" over 200 punches against Hopkins is a fine example. I've re watched that fight myself and counted landed punches, and while I don't have it in front of me, I believe I had Joe landing under 40 clean punches total. That's quite a massive difference from Compubox wouldn't you say?

                    I've stated repeatedly over the years that if Compubox wants to be taken seriously they should have unofficial numbers during the fight (making it clear these numbers are done in real time and not accurate) and then after the fight watch the tapes, recount and publish their revised official findings.
                    He's also a Calzaghe hater too. That's what he's most known for. You're a butthurt Pac fan. Both of you are biased as ****.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by jas View Post
                      the only explanation for people diminishing daggums fine report and suggesting he is being inconsistent by saying it isnt olympic boxing is yet again, nuthuggery to an embarrassing degree

                      or ignorance

                      because daguum has, several times, in this thread said for example, " pac landed the better punches so i give him this round" . statements that completely refute the notion that daguum is scoring olympic style
                      He gave Pacquiao 6 rounds. No way you can find 6 rounds in that fight to give Pacquiao. Impossible unless you're biased.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP