If I was 6'3 I wouldn't be 210 pounds I would be much bigger and compact...ali in the 70's was so...he planted on his shots more and had better accuracy with them despite the less mobility,this was due also to bigger faster 70's guys....he was more gifted with the footwork but do you think his less girth of the 60's would have beat the better 70's fighters?This isn't the debate I was just looking and see many boxing historians classify him as a runner type style.
Its not about primes....Do you think the faster footed 60's Ali beats the more durable slightly stronger ali of the 70's who lost but beat better fighters than the 60's era?
You are wrong Bill coxx being one of them...try again.Being a runner style is FOOTWORK...really this is dumb!
a runner, in the modern context is a derogatory term used to describe a fighter who moves around the ring and doesnt throw punches, look up andre dirrell.
He was hit all the time?And again Runner style is not evading throwing punches it is simply footwork...this will be my last reply my common sense meter on this topic is used up,except if new England posts!
It's hard for me to respond to this because I have no idea what you're trying to say.
Tweet
Comment