Comments Thread For: Froch: When Khan Steps To Top Level, He's Been Beaten

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You know it was because of the Pac fight on the table at the time right? Who could blame him? Still it doesn't matter why fights didn't happen he didn't fight and beat the best at 140 and is not going to do that now at 147.

The best ducked him. Froch fought the best and got completely outclassed.

Proof of course that Froch is a top level fighter and Khan isn't.

[Spray_resistant]

The best ducked him. Froch fought the best and got completely outclassed.

Proof of course that Froch is a top level fighter and Khan isn't.

You don't get credit for fights that didn't happen, no one is ducking Khan a better more lucrative fight against a better fighter came along for Bradley is all. He had belts, lost to PEDerson, got ko'd by Garcia, gets an ok win against Alexander and is now just a 147lb contender while Froch is one of the best 168lbers ever his career solidified.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

You don't get credit for fights that didn't happen, no one is ducking Khan a better more lucrative fight against a better fighter came along for Bradley is all. He had belts, lost to PEDerson, got ko'd by Garcia, gets an ok win against Alexander and is now just a 147lb contender while Froch is one of the best 168lbers ever his career solidified.

When its all said and done this is pure 100% fact.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You don't get credit for fights that didn't happen, no one is ducking Khan a better more lucrative fight against a better fighter came along for Bradley is all. He had belts, lost to PEDerson, got ko'd by Garcia, gets an ok win against Alexander and is now just a 147lb contender while Froch is one of the best 168lbers ever his career solidified.

You also don't get credit for fighting the best and getting completely outclassed. Froch has stayed in the same division. Won some fights, lost some fights, won world titles, lost world titles. At the end of the day, his career isn't all that much better than Khan's and it's completely beyond false to say that Khan isn't a top level fighter.

Khan has moved into a new division and is still young - Froch hasn't and won't so I don't see how that is even a fair comparison.

[LacedUp]

The best ducked him. Froch fought the best and got completely outclassed.

Proof of course that Froch is a top level fighter and Khan isn't.

There's a small difference between being outpointed by one of the best fighters in the world and getting KOd by Garcia and Prescott and losing to Peterson - Even though that shouldn't really have been a loss.

Froch's resume is miles better than Khan's anyway. I can't see how that's disputed.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

There's a small difference between being outpointed by one of the best fighters in the world and getting KOd by Garcia and Prescott and losing to Peterson - Even though that shouldn't really have been a loss.

Froch's resume is miles better than Khan's anyway. I can't see how that's disputed.

When Khan has stepped to top level, he has not always been beaten. Again, he's been beat the same number of times as Carl Froch.

[gmc_rfc_06]

What "truth" did he speak? Khan has lost twice as has Froch.

When Froch steps to top level, he has been beaten.

Truth doe.

Khan has 3 losses: one of them is a bit dodgy due to Peterson's 'TRT', but he has 3.

Froch has fought a gauntlet of top fighters of every style over the course of his career and holds a win over all but one of them: the #2 P4P fighter in the world when active. I thought he won both Kessler fights, but he didn't get the decision and made up for it next time out.

Khan's losses have come to fighters not close to that level and he rematched none. Since Garcia, Khan has not returned to the real top level and doesn't even seem interested in fighting the top guys, instead he is actively avoiding them.

[Spray_resistant]

You also don't get credit for fighting the best and getting completely outclassed. Froch has stayed in the same division. Won some fights, lost some fights, won world titles, lost world titles. At the end of the day, his career isn't all that much better than Khan's and it's completely beyond false to say that Khan isn't a top level fighter.

Khan has moved into a new division and is still young - Froch hasn't and won't so I don't see how that is even a fair comparison.

Just stop, Froch has 1 clear unavenged loss and has stated his willingness to try to correct that.

Froch really doesn't need to do anything more if he wanted to retire now he will have had a fantastic career with many quality wins and the argument of "he young doe" for Khan can't weigh against that when he is just in the shuffle now no where in the mix for the number 1 spot at 147.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Khan has 3 losses: one of them is a bit dodgy due to Peterson's 'TRT', but he has 3.

Froch has fought a gauntlet of top fighters of every style over the course of his career and holds a win over all but one of them: the #2 P4P fighter in the world when active. I thought he won both Kessler fights, but he didn't get the decision and made up for it next time out.

Khan's losses have come to fighters not close to that level and he rematched none. Since Garcia, Khan has not returned to the real top level and doesn't even seem interested in fighting the top guys, instead he is actively avoiding them.

A bit dodgy? Peterson was on steroids. Even with the steroids, I think most believe Khan won. You want to talk dodgy, lets talk the Froch-Dirrell decision

Look I am one of Carl Froch's biggest advocates but Khan has fought a list of good fighters and has been a two time champion. To say he's been beaten every time he steps up is patently false and people like you saying "he's right" doesn't help the situation because he's clearly not right at all.

[LacedUp]

When Khan has stepped to top level, he has not always been beaten. Again, he's been beat the same number of times as Carl Froch.

No no I agree.

He's had some good wins like Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Judah, Maidana, Alexander etc all current, past or future world champions.