Comments Thread For: Froch: When Khan Steps To Top Level, He's Been Beaten

[gmc_rfc_06]

A bit dodgy? Peterson was on steroids. Even with the steroids, I think most believe Khan won. You want to talk dodgy, lets talk the Froch-Dirrell decision

Look I am one of Carl Froch's biggest advocates but Khan has fought a list of good fighters and has been a two time champion. To say he's been beaten every time he steps up is patently false and people like you saying "he's right" doesn't help the situation because he's clearly not right at all.

Froch never said that though, you added the 'every time' part. Froch said he's lost a few times...perhaps a reason as to why he doesn't seem to want to fight the top level guys at this point.

Khan has beat some good fighters, but he's not beat a top level guy for 5 years and seems to be avoiding everybody of a certain style: that being guys that can punch. Froch has beat some great fighters, be if guys who stylistically favour him or guys who stylistically don't, he's fought them all and failed to beat only one.

[Wicky]

When Khan has stepped to top level, he has not always been beaten. Again, he's been beat the same number of times as Carl Froch.

Khan's 3 fights in 33.
Froch 2 fights in 35.

Official, rather than your skewed interpretation.

[whatismyname]

Froch been hating on Khan since day 1. I would like to see David Haye stick up for Khan a bit against Froch but I doubt it happens since he's cool with Froch and add to that that Froch licks Haye's arse.

Khan recently spent half of Froch's fight purse on a new wedding hall lmao. Forch so damn salty that a little Pakistani boy has made more in his career then the so called warrior has over the majority of his. Only recently has Froch got some popularity in the UK and still the average person still doesn't know who this big nosed kunt is. Khan is 1000x more popular in the UK and worldwide then mr 'I have a dream, to fight in Vegas'.

Add to that he talks chit about the GOAT Ali, Froch is a certified kunt and his wife strips down for money the whore.

LOL! excellent finish to Your post there

[Daddy T]

Kahn's first loss wasn't really due to stepping up to top level and his loss to PEDerson is BS.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Froch never said that though, you added the 'every time' part. Froch said he's lost a few times...perhaps a reason as to why he doesn't seem to want to fight the top level guys at this point.

Khan has beat some good fighters, but he's not beat a top level guy for 5 years and seems to be avoiding everybody of a certain style: that being guys that can punch. Froch has beat some great fighters, be if guys who stylistically favour him or guys who stylistically don't, he's fought them all and failed to beat only one.

Watch his interview on Be Real TV, I think it is. He clearly says every time and fails to acknowledge or give him any credit for any of his wins. Froch is either extremely ignorant or just blinded by jealousy when it comes to Amir Khan.

As if Froch didn't publicly admit he didn't really want to fight Ward again because of his "boring style". I mean.....come on. Froch tends to look dodgy against the styles that Khan looks good against and vice versa.

[~Doublechin~]

I would have to disagree with Froch here. Khan has losses to Prescott, Garcia and a hometown robbery to a juiced up Peterson that Khan beat. They were not Khan's most top level fighters.

Prescott is far from Top level. Garcia was getting pommled until the head down eyes closed left hook and is far from top level as we've seen and Peterson.... i shall go no further.

If you were to argue that Khan loses when he steps he would have lost against Malignaggi and Kotelnik, in Khans first international fights.
Khan would have lost to Maidana, lost to Collazo in his first fight at 147, and lost to Alexander who is a credible top level fighter.

Froch is an individual who has a great resume but little character. I'd say the lad is jealous of Khan who has many fights in Vegas, something Froch has yet to achieve.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Khan's 3 fights in 33.
Froch 2 fights in 35.

Official, rather than your skewed interpretation.

Khan has an official loss to a man who admitted he was on performance enhancing drugs. The fact that the fight was not overturned or at least declared a no contest is one of the biggest travesties in recent memory but OK Khan has 1 more "official loss" than Froch. Let's pretend the Dirrell decision wasn't questionable too.

Still doesn't explain how Froch can say Khan always loses at top level. His last fight was against a top fighter - a 168 version of Alexander probably would have tied Froch up in knots for more than a few rounds whereas Khan whitewashed him like he was nothing.

[gmc_rfc_06]

Watch his interview on Be Real TV, I think it is. He clearly says every time and fails to acknowledge or give him any credit for any of his wins. Froch is either extremely ignorant or just blinded by jealousy when it comes to Amir Khan.

As if Froch didn't publicly admit he didn't really want to fight Ward again because of his "boring style". I mean.....come on. Froch tends to look dodgy against the styles that Khan looks good against and vice versa.

I don't disagree that Froch is harsh when it comes to Khan, but in the case of this story I see no problem with what he said. I don't even think this is him having a dig, purely saying why Khan-Brook should happen.

Froch didn't want to fight Ward again, but he would have done it in Nottingham which Ward didn't agree to. The looking good against different style fighters is very true, but that's what I like about Froch, he's fought all the top guys and that includes a number of them who were stylistically difficult, he just fights.

[General STRUGG]

As much as i hate khans choice of opponent brook isnt really fighting the best possible opponents either.

[HanzGruber]

Khan has an official loss to a man who admitted he was on performance enhancing drugs. The fact that the fight was not overturned or at least declared a no contest is one of the biggest travesties in recent memory but OK Khan has 1 more "official loss" than Froch. Let's pretend the Dirrell decision wasn't questionable too.

Still doesn't explain how Froch can say Khan always loses at top level. His last fight was against a top fighter - a 168 version of Alexander probably would have tied Froch up in knots for more than a few rounds whereas Khan whitewashed him like he was nothing.

He never admitted they were peds. Ibf determined they didn't enhance his performance