Is Cotto too small for 160 or not?
Collapse
-
Maybe some fans think it's OK for a world champ who has no injuries to not defend his title for a year. I think a good champion should defend his title against a worthy challenger at least twice a year. Some fans believe Cotto will eventually defending his title against GGG at the standard weight limit of 160 pounds. Cotto has already had a year to fight GGG who is his clear number one challenger. I don't think Cotto will ever fight GGG but time will tell.Comment
-
Stop embarrassing yourself. You said that Cotto/Geale would be a gauge for Cotto at MW when Cotto has already faced a MW. You lost now move on.
I have no problem with Cotto not facing GGG or any MW for that matter. I even voted that he's too small for the division. With that said, what Cotto should do is vacate and stay at 154 rather than cherry pick MW opponents.
Just think about it. How is Geale getting a shot at the lineal MW title and the guy who sparked him in 3 rounds isn't? Not to mention, Cotto criticized GGG's weak resume yet he's willing to give the guy that GGG whooped in 3 rounds a shot.
Talk about comedy!These fanboys don't understand logic.
Comment
-
As much as you want him to not be a mw, he is. Sorry.
Comment
-
I never said that either. You're just like Bardock, you're little brain thinks something and you assume it's reality. But since you think I said that, where did I say he shouldn't fight GGG? I've said it as I have been, Cotto has a voluntary and he's taking it. At which point the WBC will say he can fight Canelo for the title instead of GGG at which point you'll shut your whore mouth because he's fighting Canelo. All this crap about lineal, mandatory, who deserves it... You won't give two ****s if it's Canelo, case in point, when it was Canelo instead of Geale people were pissed at Cotto for "ducking." You being the perfect example.
What's my point? You're b*tch ass fine with Canelo (someone who NEVER FOUGHT at MW) getting a shot at the LINEAL title, but a real MW who had a loss doesn't deserve it. You sound dumb as rocks man, but it isn't suprising coming from someone who obviously is as dumb as rocks. I hadn't even posted in this thread yet an you brought up talking about something I never even said... Sad. You haven't gone ******, you went completely insane taking thoughts in your head as actual facts.Comment
-
I never said that either. You're just like Bardock, you're little brain thinks something and you assume it's reality. But since you think I said that, where did I say he shouldn't fight GGG? I've said it as I have been, Cotto has a voluntary and he's taking it. At which point the WBC will say he can fight Canelo for the title instead of GGG at which point you'll shut your whore mouth because he's fighting Canelo. All this crap about lineal, mandatory, who deserves it... You won't give two ****s if it's Canelo, case in point, when it was Canelo instead of Geale people were pissed at Cotto for "ducking." You being the perfect example.
What's my point? You're b*tch ass fine with Canelo (someone who NEVER FOUGHT at MW) getting a shot at the LINEAL title, but a real MW who had a loss doesn't deserve it. You sound dumb as rocks man, but it isn't suprising coming from someone who obviously is as dumb as rocks. I hadn't even posted in this thread yet an you brought up talking about something I never even said... Sad. You haven't gone ******, you went completely insane taking thoughts in your head as actual facts.Comment
-
Comment
-
I almost feel sorry for you sometimes. I really do.Comment
-
You lead poisoned idiot...
Because a fighter is older and fighting at a higher weight, does NOT mean he is a TRUE MW.
His PRIME weight is what he was born to fight at... NOT where he winds up after he is out of prime and 34 years old.
What's next? You gonna tell me Duran was a REAL MW against Hagler?????
Dunce.Comment
Comment