I already did read it.
Theres nothing that says that the fighter would still be able to sue for extra amounts because there is also a fighter contract. So the legal bindings stand.
Here is the quote from Koncz himself, check the highlight:
So he is basically saying the fighters cant use their promotional contract to find recourse in regards to drug testing penalties.
Theres nothing that says that the fighter would still be able to sue for extra amounts because there is also a fighter contract. So the legal bindings stand.
Here is the quote from Koncz himself, check the highlight:
You can argue all day if [a penalty agreement] should be with the USADA contract or the main contract. What do you have to lose or gain in that argument? It's a simple thing -- if you fail, you pay the other guy $5 million. The issue is simple -- are you willing to agree to a penalty of $5 million? The drug-testing terms and any penalty, that's between the fighters not the promoters.
Comment