Comments Thread For: Ellerbe, Koncz Trade Verbal Shots Over $5 Million Fine

[Rath]

I'm the one that stated comprehension wasn't pacfans strong suite on first or second page of article and stated what ellerbe was saying before video was posted it wasn't hard to understand what ellerbe was stating about agreeing to that clause and then limited monetary compensation

if you have not seen that video would you with certainty exactly know what ellerbe was alluding to in that article?

[SchoolTheseCats]

even before you presented that youtube clip, my contention was about the reading comprehension that some of the Floyd fans were saying about the article. tell me where is that arum statement in the article?

how could you comprehend something that was not even there?

when i ask about the link or anything that might support the post made by Hanz about unlimited liabilities, it is also very clear that i said make another thread for the and we will discuss it there did i not?

but as of this moment what we are talking discussing or even debating about is the reading comprehension with the presented article and not wit the youtube link you have presented.


see, that's why i said i owned all of those poster here who were talking about reading comprehension when they themselves don;t understand what reading comprehension is in the first place.

can you read comprehend a video and an audio?

Genius Floyd fans

wise guy go back to first page you'll see I stated what ellerbe was saying way before video was posted by rollingtide which proves my point about comprehension it doesn't take a rocket science to understand what ellerbe was saying

[GRUSTLER]

it is not enough that you don't have reading comprehension, your logic is also Floyd err i mean flawed.

put all my post in one page and all your post in the same on this thread and lets discuss it see what happens

[IMG]http://i67.***********.com/albums/h315/GRUSTLER/jay-z_zpsygb176zt.png[/IMG]

[borbor]

How about if you post an article from the web you post it in it's entirety

The rest of this article can be read at ESPN : Dan Rafael

We can have a better understanding of Koncz reasoning and why Ellerbe is very simple and irritating yes man

[SchoolTheseCats]

if you have not seen that video would you with certainty exactly know what ellerbe was alluding to in that article?

dude I didn't see the video until rollingtide posted it on page 16-17 I made my statement on 1-2 I forget the proof is in beginning of article Idk why you still going on it was common sense understanding what ellerbe was alluding to

[Dean_Razorback]

u know what would be awesome? if the fight ends up in a draw with both guys testing positive for something banned after the fight, that way we would get rid of most idiots in this thread.

[GRUSTLER]

How about if you post an article from the web you post it in it's entirety

The rest of this article can be read at ESPN : Dan Rafael

We can have a better understanding of Koncz reasoning and why Ellerbe is very simple and irritating yes man

But Arum sided with Team Mayweather and put the 5Mil penalty to rest. What else is there to touch on?

[SchoolTheseCats]

let me break it down for you simple fools with no reading comprehension

Team Pacquaio wanted to implement a $5 million dollar penalty for a failed Test. Team Mayweather turned it down with the mindset that Team Pacquaio is trying to nullify the actual consequences that comes with a failed test from USADA (like that even matters but thats another conversation).

Team Pacquaio at no point ever said that the $5 million was to replace the standard USADA penalty but was more so to add on to the penalty. Team Pacquaio are from the mindset if you have absolutely nothing to hide then a simple cash penalty would be a non issue.

Essentially all we have here is a PR chess game, Team Pacquaio trying to make it look like Team Mayweather has something to hide by denying the request, and Team Mayweather are trying to flip this lil PR attack back on Team Pacquaio making them look like they are trying to replace the USADA penalty with their own cash penalty instead (which is not the case) as to say Team Pacquaio is worried about getting caught and banned form boxing. So no one really checkmate'd anyone, if anything Team Pacquaio will go for the stalemate as they have nothing to support their request and Team Mayweather have the contracts on their side. So no one really won this battle both subtly accused each other of the exact same thing.

why would you agree to a 5mil fine when you can sue for way more then that jackass if you agree to that and its agreed upon in contract and signed you can't then turn around and sue for more which limits your monetary compensation that's ****** for both parties to agree to

[GRUSTLER]

if you have not seen that video would you with certainty exactly know what ellerbe was alluding to in that article?

We have no plan on limiting the liability and damages if Manny tested positive, Ellerbe said. They must be worried if they're bringing this up. Essentially, what they're trying to do is put a $5 million price tag if Manny tested positive. It's awfully su****ious to me.

Isn't this the same thing Bob Arum said they said and agreed with for their side as well? Stop it Rath... Please stop beating the dead dog.

[GRUSTLER]

why would you agree to a 5mil fine when you can sue for way more then that jackass if you agree to that and its agreed upon in contract and signed you can't then turn around and sue for more which limits your monetary compensation that's ****** for both parties to agree to

I see the term "JACK ASS" just entered into your post. They will bring it out of you. This is the only term that I can think of and call them when I'm on here.