Comments Thread For: Ellerbe, Koncz Trade Verbal Shots Over $5 Million Fine

[GRUSTLER]

I clearly stated way before video was posted if they agree to the 5mil fine can't turn around and sue for more because it's agreed upon in contract which is what ellerbe was saying

Rath might just rival any Pacquiao fan in the field of ******ity. He's not the worst because Beercules and Junior Thong hold these titles but he is indeed a stubborn guy to try and deflect the facts that have been placed before him to prove he is right. Only women due stuff like that.

[KnockoutKings]

fight is set, dont really care about any other drama. i'll try to care when somebody actually fails a test.

[GRUSTLER]

Reporter:

uhhh Manny you got uuh made a bet up with Floyd the 5 million dollar bet over drug testing that uuh if one one man failed the drug test they would pay the other 5 million bucks has he accepted the offer?

this is what arum said exactly word for word

We proposed the 5 million dollar penalty if uhh either guy failed the drug test. They rejected it, because they rejected it not because they were afraid of, to be honest as we understand it they said look Manny failed the drug test we'll collect a lot more than 5 million dollars, and I told Michael Koncz and Manny as well uhh Maywether fails the drug test believe me will collect more than the 5 million dollars so that's the reason that the fine is didn't make that 5 miion dollar penalty not because they were afraid that they would fail the test, but they wanted to collect more if the other guy fail the test. but everything has been agreed as far as the drug testing is concerned.

Now lets discuss


This is what has been said in that clip word for word.

Arum answered the reporters question about the BET the bet that Pac made with Floyd

Ok so why are you still debating against Mayweather fans about it? The 5Mil penalty was a bad idea as stated by Arum because it limits the amount of money either could go after and receive if any fighter failed the test. How is this not com*****g in your brain? What exactly are you trying to prove?

[GRUSTLER]

fight is set, dont really care about any other drama. i'll try to care when somebody actually fails a test.

I agree but I think the main fascination is the fact that dudes don't get the obvious. It's mind boggling how ****** people allow themselves to be just to belittle one person. It's absolutely amazing OR people are really that ******.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Rath might just rival any Pacquiao fan in the field of ******ity. He's not the worst because Beercules and Junior Thong hold these titles but he is indeed a stubborn guy to try and deflect the facts that have been placed before him to prove he is right. Only women due stuff like that.

I guess his mission is to look like a assshole which he accomplished

[Rath]

I clearly stated way before video was posted if they agree to the 5mil fine can't turn around and sue for more because it's agreed upon in contract which is what ellerbe was saying

even before you presented that youtube clip, my contention was about the reading comprehension that some of the Floyd fans were saying about the article. tell me where is that arum statement in the article?

how could you comprehend something that was not even there?

when i ask about the link or anything that might support the post made by Hanz about unlimited liabilities, it is also very clear that i said make another thread for the and we will discuss it there did i not?

but as of this moment what we are talking discussing or even debating about is the reading comprehension with the presented article and not wit the youtube link you have presented.


see, that's why i said i owned all of those poster here who were talking about reading comprehension when they themselves don;t understand what reading comprehension is in the first place.

can you read comprehend a video and an audio?

Genius Floyd fans

[Rath]

I guess his mission is to look like a assshole which he accomplished

who looks like a poop hole now genius?

try to read and comprehend a video clip you einstein you

[CANELOLUJAH]

let me break it down for you simple fools with no reading comprehension

Team Pacquaio wanted to implement a $5 million dollar penalty for a failed Test. Team Mayweather turned it down with the mindset that Team Pacquaio is trying to nullify the actual consequences that comes with a failed test from USADA (like that even matters but thats another conversation).

Team Pacquaio at no point ever said that the $5 million was to replace the standard USADA penalty but was more so to add on to the penalty. Team Pacquaio are from the mindset if you have absolutely nothing to hide then a simple cash penalty would be a non issue.

Essentially all we have here is a PR chess game, Team Pacquaio trying to make it look like Team Mayweather has something to hide by denying the request, and Team Mayweather are trying to flip this lil PR attack back on Team Pacquaio making them look like they are trying to replace the USADA penalty with their own cash penalty instead (which is not the case) as to say Team Pacquaio is worried about getting caught and banned form boxing. So no one really checkmate'd anyone, if anything Team Pacquaio will go for the stalemate as they have nothing to support their request and Team Mayweather have the contracts on their side. So no one really won this battle both subtly accused each other of the exact same thing.

[SchoolTheseCats]

even before you presented that youtube clip, my contention was about the reading comprehension that some of the Floyd fans were saying about the article. tell me where is that arum statement in the article?

how could you comprehend something that was not even there?

when i ask about the link or anything that might support the post made by Hanz about unlimited liabilities, it is also very clear that i said make another thread for the and we will discuss it there did i not?

but as of this moment what we are talking discussing or even debating about is the reading comprehension with the presented article and not wit the youtube link you have presented.


see, that's why i said i owned all of those poster here who were talking about reading comprehension when they themselves don;t understand what reading comprehension is in the first place.

can you read comprehend a video and an audio?

Genius Floyd fans

I'm the one that stated comprehension wasn't pacfans strong suite on first or second page of article and stated what ellerbe was saying before video was posted it wasn't hard to understand what ellerbe was stating about agreeing to that clause and then limited monetary compensation

[Rath]

Ok so why are you still debating against Mayweather fans about it? The 5Mil penalty was a bad idea as stated by Arum because it limits the amount of money either could go after and receive if any fighter failed the test. How is this not com*****g in your brain? What exactly are you trying to prove?

it is not enough that you don't have reading comprehension, your logic is also Floyd err i mean flawed.

put all my post in one page and all your post in the same on this thread and lets discuss it see what happens