Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'm gonna pop in every couple of weeks and post something, just to get spoon wound up again.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by THE REED***8482;
      As long as people are still talking about it, it will stay pinned.

      If it's not pinned you're gonna start seeing floyd-pac threads being started again.
      lol I kind of agree with the bold, which is funny since relatively few people are participating in this thread.

      I bet this stays pinned right through when rumors of a rematch start churning in early 2016.

      Speaking of which, if they do do that, Mayweather will naturally find a way to sell it to his fans. "First time I showed him who the better boxer was, this time I'm coming to hurt him". That statement right there leads to 2mil ppv buys.
      Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 08-06-2015, 02:25 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
        lol I kind of agree with the bold, which is funny since relatively few people are participating in this thread.

        I bet this stays pinned right through when rumors of a rematch start churning in early 2016.

        Speaking of which, if they do do that, Mayweather will naturally find a way to sell it to his fans. "First time I showed him who the better boxer was, this time I'm coming to hurt him". That statement right there leads to 2mil ppv buys.
        And you'll tune in hoping Manny will be able to do something differently the second time around.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
          lol I kind of agree with the bold, which is funny since relatively few people are participating in this thread.

          I bet this stays pinned right through when rumors of a rematch start churning in early 2016.

          Speaking of which, if they do do that, Mayweather will naturally find a way to sell it to his fans. "First time I showed him who the better boxer was, this time I'm coming to hurt him". That statement right there leads to 2mil ppv buys.
          That's actually a very good pitch, and not unlikely as he does better the second time around.

          Pacquiao's pitch to his fans will be that now he 100%, no "injury" and his fans will eat it up.

          Of course, if/when he loses he'll come up with another excuse and they'll eat that **** up too.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
            And you'll tune in hoping Manny will be able to do something differently the second time around.
            lmao oh of course, I don't deny that. This time I will probably be much more reserved in my anticipation and much less enthusiastic about Pac's chances but I'd without a doubt watch it.

            My comment was aimed at those who deny they'd watch the second one because of how decisive they found the victory to be / how lacking in action it was. I think many of them could be persuaded to part with their PPV dollars.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by THE REED™
              As long as people are still talking about it, it will stay pinned.

              If it's not pinned you're gonna start seeing floyd-pac threads being started again.
              Seems like a fair trade off now I think about it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                LOL you didn't answer anything I asked you and could not explain your previous statements. So what if I used an example of a heavyweight? They have the same rules as welterweights! Explain how what Vladimir Klitsckho did is more acceptable than what Floyd did? How is clinching over 100 times OK but not clinching 17 times?

                Because he's a heavyweight? That's your answer? LMAO ******.
                You're a walking contradiction. You Love Asian martial arts movie with lots of action, but loves a a fighter who runs and hugs for a living.

                Likes Keanu Reeves movie, only to find out Keanu is a big fan of floyd's nemesis haha

                You call me a ******, when it's actually you who have comprehension defeciencies lol

                There's more, but I'll stop there haha

                Anyway, I'll try to give you insights, but I dont expect you to get it since you have a comprehension disorder lol

                Never said clinching is illegal. Clinching happens in boxing. As ive said most for being tangled up or for resting between rounds. Heavyweight does it more since they spend energy faster than lower weight classes. That is fine clinching as long as both fighters are not blocking an exchanging through clinching. it becomes pathetic and foul cliching is when you clinch to prevent an opponent from firing back. As to 'holding' that's FOUL IN boxing. There is cliching and there's intentional holding which is technically still clinching. That's what your hero floyd loves to do and seems to always get away with it, but yeah it still is clinching. but preventing an opponent from punching you through clinching is foul. You should block an attack from you arms not through hugging. your hero floyd gets aways from excessive holding to prevent a fighter from ever exchanging. Simply put it. It's called Vagina boxing.

                Here is a great example of vagina clinching ehem holding..

                Last edited by Spoon23; 08-06-2015, 07:22 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                  You're a walking contradiction. You Love Asian martial arts movie with action and loves a a fighter who runs and hugs for a living.

                  Likes Keanu Reeves movie, only to find out Keanu is a big fan of floyd's nemesis haha

                  You call me a ******, when it's actually you who have comprehension defeciencies lol

                  There's more, but I'll stop there haha

                  Anyway, I'll try to give you insights, but I dont expect you to get it si ce you have a comprehension disorder lol

                  Never said clinching is illegal. Clinching happens in boxing. As ive said most for being tangled up or for resting between rounds. Heavyweight does it more since they spend energy faster than lower weight classes. That is fine clinchinf as long as both fighters are not blocking an exchanging through clinching. it becomes pathetic cliching is when you clinch to prevent an opponent from firing back. As to 'holding' that's FOUL IN boxing. There is cliching and there's intentional holding which is technically still clinching. That's what your hero floyd loves to do and seems to always get away with it, but yeah it still is clinching. but preventing an opponent from punching you through clinching is foul. You should block an attack from you arms not through hugging. your hero floyd gets aways from excessive holding to prevent a fighter from ever exchanging. Simply put it. It's called Vagina boxing.

                  Here is a great example of vagina clinching ehem holding..

                  .files.wordpress.com/2014/09/455404770_10.jpg?w=660[/IMG]
                  Boxing is not a movie dumb dumb. My avatar has nothing to do with my tastes in boxers. You are contradicting yourself. You say holding to prevent an opponent from punching is still clinching. And you say clinching is not illegal. Then what the **** is Floyd getting "away with?" if he's not doing anything illegal? LOL

                  There are fighters in all weight classes who have clinched to slow down their opponents aggression... that has been a part of boxing since the beginning. So what are you crying about?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by johnm is... View Post
                    I'm gonna pop in every couple of weeks and post something, just to get spoon wound up again.
                    Naah, It's coz you can't handle the truth. It's breaking your fragile heart. And seeing your boy exposed Changes your perception of the made up truth in your head. Ask yourself.. Are you sweating??

                    Coz I think you are

                    Cheers Kiddo!
                    Last edited by Spoon23; 08-06-2015, 08:11 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                      Boxing is not a movie dumb dumb. My avatar has nothing to do with my tastes in boxers. You are contradicting yourself. You say holding to prevent an opponent from punching is still clinching. And you say clinching is not illegal. Then what the **** is Floyd getting "away with?" if he's not doing anything illegal? LOL

                      There are fighters in all weight classes who have clinched to slow down their opponents aggression... that has been a part of boxing since the beginning. So what are you crying about?
                      I told you. You won't get it even if you try. No worries mate. Just shake it off.. Your I.Q. Defficiency is way too low.. First off, movies are really different from boxing. Never denied that fact dumbo. It's just your lack of comprehension skills won't make you understand past 3rd grade level reading haha.. Anyway, stay safe mr Kungfu man.
                      Last edited by Spoon23; 08-06-2015, 08:13 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP