New Ring P4P ratings
Collapse
-
Beating Lara is better than any win GGG has. That's probably the reason. Hell beating trout who beat Cotto is better than any win GGG has
Neither guy is P4P material yet imoComment
-
How the hell is Tim Bradley on there?
He lost 2x against Pacquiao
Loss against Provodnikov (the knockdown should've been counted by the dumbass ref and therefore should've resulted in him losing the fight)
Drew against Chaves
Controversial "win" against Marquez
he shouldn't even be on the listComment
-
The first two are pretty accurate. Rosado might have beaten the worst but he lasted the longest. Getting KO'd in 8 is better than getting KO'd or quitting in 2, fact.man thats exactly what u said
"Rosado did better than everyone I have listed against GGG, shut your piehole. You obviously don't know **** about boxing. "
"Lara is not better than anyone of them either because he runs and doesn't fight."
"The best of the best, the resume doesn't even matter you can tell just by looking at how they fight."
Lara could be better, but he isn't. He has all the tools but not the balls, he's afraid to get hit more than anything else. And for that reason he's a limited fighter who won't amount to anything simply because of that. You don't go to the Patriots and say I only play MY way, **** your playbook. Well in the US, running and not throwing doesn't make you money or give you the benefit of the doubt in decisions.
I also cleared up my last statement, it's not like anyone ever words something incorrectly. I don't need to see who Canelo or GGG have fought over their careers, I can see who is better just by looking at them fight. It's no different that obviously being able to tell LeBron is better than Carmelo, I don't need to see the rings or history, you just know.Comment
-
Take a deep breath, you sound like a female right now. Rosado is a gatekeeper, he was just surviving and didn't win a round against Golovkin. The fact that you put Lara and the likes of Geale, Murray etc. in the same bag proves that you may be the one who needs to learn a thing or two about boxing. I do think Golovkin is better than Canelo, but Canelo looked spectacular too when he beat up Angulo and he'll probably look as good against Kirkland. It's more difficult to look good against fighters like Trout and Lara. Ask the man in your avi...Rosado did better than everyone I have listed against GGG, shut your piehole. You obviously don't know **** about boxing.
Lara is not better than anyone of them either because he runs and doesn't fight. To think, he would have beat Canelo if he just threw punches. Canelo is also a B class fighter which is why he goes the distance in close fights with them. GGG is not even an "A" class fighter like a Cotto or Martinez or Vlad... GGG is in the Manny/Floyd level of ELITE fighters. The best of the best, the resume doesn't even matter you can tell just by looking at how they fight.Comment
-
You know what I believe it boils down to, is we are so much a creature of the action moment. I say "action" based off how most of his fights have ended. I understand Gonzalez has knocked out like 10 of 11, but his resume compared to everyone else on this pound for pound list is pretty pathetic.Comment
-
-
How the hell is Tim Bradley on there?
He lost 2x against Pacquiao
Loss against Provodnikov (the knockdown should've been counted by the dumbass ref and therefore should've resulted in him losing the fight)
Drew against Chaves
Controversial "win" against Marquez
he shouldn't even be on the list
Comment
-
Comment
Comment