Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Ring P4P ratings

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by smoothsmg View Post
    Only reason i say Froch 4th is strictly based off his resume. You can say Froch or Bradley have the best resume over the past 7 years and you wont get an argument out of me.
    I got respect for Froch. I believe he belongs on the list. But P4P better than Gonzalez? Can't go there.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
      How in the hell is Canelo above GGG? How is Canelo in the top 10 at all... It's Oscars magazine, nevermind.
      Beating Lara is better than any win GGG has. That's probably the reason. Hell beating trout who beat Cotto is better than any win GGG has

      Neither guy is P4P material yet imo

      Comment


      • How the hell is Tim Bradley on there?

        He lost 2x against Pacquiao
        Loss against Provodnikov (the knockdown should've been counted by the dumbass ref and therefore should've resulted in him losing the fight)
        Drew against Chaves
        Controversial "win" against Marquez

        he shouldn't even be on the list

        Comment


        • Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
          man thats exactly what u said

          "Rosado did better than everyone I have listed against GGG, shut your piehole. You obviously don't know **** about boxing. "

          "Lara is not better than anyone of them either because he runs and doesn't fight."

          "The best of the best, the resume doesn't even matter you can tell just by looking at how they fight."
          The first two are pretty accurate. Rosado might have beaten the worst but he lasted the longest. Getting KO'd in 8 is better than getting KO'd or quitting in 2, fact.

          Lara could be better, but he isn't. He has all the tools but not the balls, he's afraid to get hit more than anything else. And for that reason he's a limited fighter who won't amount to anything simply because of that. You don't go to the Patriots and say I only play MY way, **** your playbook. Well in the US, running and not throwing doesn't make you money or give you the benefit of the doubt in decisions.

          I also cleared up my last statement, it's not like anyone ever words something incorrectly. I don't need to see who Canelo or GGG have fought over their careers, I can see who is better just by looking at them fight. It's no different that obviously being able to tell LeBron is better than Carmelo, I don't need to see the rings or history, you just know.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
            Rosado did better than everyone I have listed against GGG, shut your piehole. You obviously don't know **** about boxing.

            Lara is not better than anyone of them either because he runs and doesn't fight. To think, he would have beat Canelo if he just threw punches. Canelo is also a B class fighter which is why he goes the distance in close fights with them. GGG is not even an "A" class fighter like a Cotto or Martinez or Vlad... GGG is in the Manny/Floyd level of ELITE fighters. The best of the best, the resume doesn't even matter you can tell just by looking at how they fight.
            Take a deep breath, you sound like a female right now. Rosado is a gatekeeper, he was just surviving and didn't win a round against Golovkin. The fact that you put Lara and the likes of Geale, Murray etc. in the same bag proves that you may be the one who needs to learn a thing or two about boxing. I do think Golovkin is better than Canelo, but Canelo looked spectacular too when he beat up Angulo and he'll probably look as good against Kirkland. It's more difficult to look good against fighters like Trout and Lara. Ask the man in your avi...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Cut Man View Post
              I got respect for Froch. I believe he belongs on the list. But P4P better than Gonzalez? Can't go there.
              You know what I believe it boils down to, is we are so much a creature of the action moment. I say "action" based off how most of his fights have ended. I understand Gonzalez has knocked out like 10 of 11, but his resume compared to everyone else on this pound for pound list is pretty pathetic.

              Comment


              • lol @ canelo

                Comment


                • Canelo should be in the top 5 awful ranking

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Death_Adder View Post
                    How the hell is Tim Bradley on there?

                    He lost 2x against Pacquiao
                    Loss against Provodnikov (the knockdown should've been counted by the dumbass ref and therefore should've resulted in him losing the fight)
                    Drew against Chaves
                    Controversial "win" against Marquez

                    he shouldn't even be on the list

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by joesaiditstrue View Post
                      Beating Lara is better than any win GGG has. That's probably the reason. Hell beating trout who beat Cotto is better than any win GGG has

                      Neither guy is P4P material yet imo
                      Canelo has been Ring p4p since Trout. He wasnt removed after getting humiliated by Floyd

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP