Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Better win: Mayweather over Canelo or Pacquiao over Bradley(2)?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by AllBoxingAD View Post
    Of course they slowed down.

    Did age play a role in the outcome of the fight?

    Of course not.

    Age was not an advantage for Bradley.

    Of course it can change the outcome, prime Pac could probably give Tim a knockdown or 2 or win the fight via TKO/KO.

    Pac was 30yrs old when he beats DLH (36 yrs old) and you guys shouting Oscar was shot as hell. Now Pac is 36 years old and beating younger guys like Bradley (30 yrs old)/Algieri and saying Pac is still Prime.

    Aside from speed, the other advantage of Pac against DLH was his age.

    Age is an advantage in any kind of sport including boxing.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by PBP View Post
      Yes because he was still below Pac after the robbery took place. Nobody in the media thought he won so it had no impact on their rankings obviously.
      Its about being rated above Pac per se, its about not dropping like you should after getting your ass whupped.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by AllBoxingAD View Post
        Its about being rated above Pac per se, its about not dropping like you should after getting your ass whupped.
        Yeah so he should be dropped behind Abner Mares, Robert Guerrero and Adrien ****ing Broner for losing to the pound for pound #1a fighter in the world at the time.

        Next.

        Comment


        • Icha- Lmao so now you were proved to be a liar or Ill informed and now I gotta be smarter?

          Get a grip

          Comment


          • Originally posted by jas View Post
            Icha- Lmao so now you were proved to be a liar or Ill informed and now I gotta be smarter?

            Get a grip
            not at all, but you know damm well that when canelo was available the word from pacs camp was 150 or nothing, now that canelo is fighting kirkland and pac is negotiating with floyd they bring up canelos name... you should know that is only for negotiating purposes ...
            again the fight could have already happened if they really wanted, no way arum lets go that much money...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by icha View Post
              not at all, but you know damm well that when canelo was available the word from pacs camp was 150 or nothing, now that canelo is fighting kirkland and pac is negotiating with floyd they bring up canelos name... you should know that is only for negotiating purposes ...
              again the fight could have already happened if they really wanted, no way arum lets go that much money...
              They would never take the fight.

              Never going to happen.

              Comment


              • Bradley had the better names on his record but canelo was by far the more dangerous fight.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by AllBoxingAD View Post
                  Since the thread is about specifically Pac-Bradley 2...

                  Why do all of you pretend that you did not in fact see Bradley be DOMINATED by Pac in the 1st fight?

                  P4P top 3? Off of that robbery? Is this a joke?

                  Pac-Bradley 2 was nothing but a formality to right the robbery that was the 1st fight.
                  Excellent point. Pac had already beat Bradley and did it in a more dominant way the first time.

                  Comment


                  • Dumb question as even PAC lost to Bradley in their fight fight is still better then Floyd vs Drainelo.

                    Comment


                    • Ok so which would be more impressive?

                      Floyd beating Canelo again?

                      Or PAC -Bradley 2?

                      I'll wait....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP