Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao vs Hearns

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hearns is huge!!! Will probably knock pac or win a comfortable decision, will never know though

    Comment


    • Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hahaha

      eff it im coming back full time

      Comment


      • Originally posted by B.U.R.N.E.R View Post
        Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hahaha

        eff it im coming back full time
        welcome back to hell

        Comment


        • pac gets KTFO.

          unfair matchup tbh.

          pac is a natural featherweight who started at flyweight and ended up at welter.

          hearns is a natural middleweight who started at welter and ended up at light heavy/cruiser later.

          Comment


          • Pacquiao never wins this fantasy match up because people can't put out in their mind his diminutive stature. He is perceived as not skilled enough even though he is very skilled because they are again imagining some type of comparison to some very skilled usually textbook guys, which is again wrong because manny pacquiao is a creator type of a guy not a textbook type.

            He is also perceived as very easy to hit, which is again very wrong, no he's not very easy to hit, you'll very greatly have to take some in order to get some against him and that is what scared most of his opponent, this usually ends in them just covering up the whole fight.

            He is perceived no-defense type of guy because of his more obvious offensive output and they are always imagining holding on in their thoughts to that once upon a time old one-dimensional pacman in his ancient past fights, who just goes all out there and nothing more, which is again wrong, this fully developed matured pacquiao isn't only hard to hit but he got very good defense through his movements, timing and sense of anticipation despite being known more as an offensive guy.

            And lastly the most idiotic thing I probably heard, if you got jab, then you got pacquiao. It's not as simple as that, you can't just jab pacuiqao; for idiots, they see this as a weapon, for ATGs they see this as an opportunity--a great opening to deliver their power shots. If you're not a real jabber guy, or a guy who specialized on it, and you're just a poser trying to do it on just that fight alone, then, you'll soon find out, every time you jab, there's a very big chance you'll be at the receiving end of a big big power punch. My guess is you won't like it very much, and then again, you'll end up covering like a shell the whole ****ing fight--a disappointment to the sport and its fans.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ButtScratcher^^ View Post

              And lastly the most idiotic thing I probably heard, if you got jab, then you got pacquiao..
              With Hearns' right hand he won't need his jab much.

              The jab is rarely, if ever, a deciding factor against a southpaw anyway.

              Paq runs in all goofy foot with his head in the air. Hearns knocks that head 45 rows back.

              Slip the jab and he runs right in to it.

              Comment


              • I would probably give Pacquiao the edge in this one at 147, Pacquiao would have a great advantage at this era being a southpaw because fighters from the late 70s - early 80s weren't used to fighting southpaws too often like fighters of today, the angles that Pacquiao will attack from will along with the very fast foot work will be very confusing for Hearns, who I don't believe has the ability to adjust or counterpunch if put under great pressure.
                But at 154 I think Hearns size and power would give him the edge.

                I'm a big Mayweather fan btw.

                Comment


                • Your opinion stinks of shit ButtScratcher.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                    Your opinion stinks of shit ButtScratcher.
                    My opinion is perfectly good, well-laid out, trying to make this thread a little more interesting, you on the other hand has nothing to say, no contribution, no elaboration, so you stink man, you're right and that shit is most probably directed in your face. You probably need a little bit of butt scratching as well, i bet you'll love it. :****you:

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail View Post
                      I would probably give Pacquiao the edge in this one at 147, Pacquiao would have a great advantage at this era being a southpaw because fighters from the late 70s - early 80s weren't used to fighting southpaws too often like fighters of today.
                      That's funny.......
                      Last edited by Rockin'; 02-16-2015, 03:02 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP