Lol my bad, it's really not anything that intense though. Basic Statistics courses in any reputable university will cover statistical significance.
What it means is that legal glove selection is not of statistical significance in determining the outcome of fights.
This doesn't mean it doesn't influence or can't determine the outcome of a fight; but by extension everything poses the potential to influence a fight.
If Mayweather were cranky, that could cause an influence (cause him to be more risky, ****** etc). If Pac were hungry that could influence the fight.
The real point being made here is that historically, within the realm of selecting LEGAL gloves there has been nothing of note to suggest the selection of legal gloves has had any significance in the actual outcome of fights. It is a factor amongst many other factors of which the influence appears to be very small.
In summation, I can't really think of a fight that I have ever watched/that boxing pundits suggested that if a guy got to wear a certain brand of legal gloves the fight would have been significantly different.
Comment