Comments Thread For: Garcia, Guerrero, Porter Reject Roc Nation Offers?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anonymous2.0
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2012
    • 11130
    • 1,854
    • 7
    • 75,058

    #11
    Originally posted by MrRolltide91
    broner was never offered that. he was lying.
    He was? I'm interested, you got a link?

    Comment

    • jjsmyth87
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2014
      • 2741
      • 95
      • 4
      • 10,723

      #12
      Loyalty is more important than money really? Push came to shove haymon would throw these guys under the bus if it meant more money for himself. He cares more about his own interests and he proved that by making Peter quillen vacate his belt

      Comment

      • Eastcoast
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2014
        • 8639
        • 288
        • 0
        • 15,501

        #13
        Originally posted by OnePunch
        Im a bit skeptical of these reports, because with both Iskowitz and Shaw on board at Roc, two VERY experienced boxing guys, they know damn well you cant just go around offering deals to fighters that already have known representation. Its called tortious interference, and neither Shaw or Isky are dumb enough to try that nonsense.

        But the bigger laugh is Guerrero saying "loyalty is more important than money", considering he just recently sued to try and get out of his contract with Golden Boy
        Those fighters all lack promotional representation, which is distinctly different than what they have with Al. I imagine RN would love for someone to push tortious interference in regards to those fighters. It would give the Ali Act some teeth.

        Comment

        • MrRolltide91
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2010
          • 12208
          • 167
          • 1
          • 30,631

          #14
          Originally posted by anonymous2.0
          He was? I'm interested, you got a link?
          dan said it in his chat


          Derek (Toronto)



          Your thoughts on Broner being indignant over a 40 million dollar offer...

          Dan Rafael, King Fight Freak (12:50 PM)



          Roc Nation officials tell me they never offered him anything like that.


          Visit ESPN for live scores, highlights and sports news. Stream exclusive games on ESPN and play fantasy sports.

          Comment

          • Scipio2009
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2014
            • 13741
            • 276
            • 64
            • 98,172

            #15
            Originally posted by Deevel916
            Its called a contract. Once you're represented by him you give up all control of your career. Could be good could be bad. Look at Broners case. I dont see him making $40mil in 5yrs with Haymon. He's a b level boxer who will lose to all the top lww's and ww's.
            Broner is only 25 years old. Barring any injuries, he should be fighting 3 to 4 times per year. Over 5 years, you're easily looking at 15-17 fights. Basically would need to average around $2.5m per fight to get to the Roc Nation number. If his star power really starts to cross over, he'll get to that $40m even quicker.

            You may think that he's only a B fighter who will lose to any somebody at 140/147, but Haymon gives him the freedom to find that out on his own. If he keeps winning, he goes onto bigger fights and bigger purses; if he loses, he stalls a bit and gets moved to a different opportunity. He's got a TV-friendly style, is charismatic, and works with an advisor who has established strong TV relationships and can get him fights.

            Comment

            • wlliam
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2013
              • 2571
              • 67
              • 7
              • 8,799

              #16
              Originally posted by jjsmyth87
              Loyalty is more important than money really? Push came to shove haymon would throw these guys under the bus if it meant more money for himself. He cares more about his own interests and he proved that by making Peter quillen vacate his belt
              Oh yeah kinda like Bob Arum huh? And Pacs loyalty to his master? Right?

              Comment

              • Rath
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2014
                • 7081
                • 161
                • 155
                • 13,464

                #17
                Originally posted by wlliam
                Oh yeah kinda like Bob Arum huh? And Pacs loyalty to his master? Right?
                I thought this is RN Garcia Porter Guerero thread, what is Pac doing here?

                Comment

                • BIGPOPPAPUMP
                  Franchise Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 46545
                  • 2,259
                  • 334
                  • 5,493,285

                  #18
                  Originally posted by OnePunch
                  Im a bit skeptical of these reports, because with both Iskowitz and Shaw on board at Roc, two VERY experienced boxing guys, they know damn well you cant just go around offering deals to fighters that already have known representation. Its called tortious interference, and neither Shaw or Isky are dumb enough to try that nonsense.

                  But the bigger laugh is Guerrero saying "loyalty is more important than money", considering he just recently sued to try and get out of his contract with Golden Boy
                  Roc Nation confirmed they approached Thurman and Wilder and also said they would speak to other Haymon fighters. I have no doubt they approached a few more guys after the Golden Boy/Haymon split. Technically those fighters are NOT under any promotional contracts.

                  Comment

                  • wlliam
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 2571
                    • 67
                    • 7
                    • 8,799

                    #19
                    Maybe if Roc Nation can stop trying to steal Haymons fighters, they can be one of the lucky promotional companies to stage a few of Haymons events?

                    Comment

                    • Divine Hammer
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 7661
                      • 376
                      • 4
                      • 37,824

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Deevel916
                      Its called a contract. Once you're represented by him you give up all control of your career. Could be good could be bad. Look at Broners case. I dont see him making $40mil in 5yrs with Haymon. He's a b level boxer who will lose to all the top lww's and ww's.
                      ^^^^exactly this. look what happened to quillin when he had to give up his wbo belt and highest payday of his career because al haymon didn't want his fighter associated with roc nation.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP