SMH P. MALIGNAGGI going at it with me on twitter

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • radioraheem
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 5915
    • 165
    • 200
    • 12,234

    #71
    Originally posted by bigjavi973
    Thank you for agreeing that USADA, VADA and WADA are all the same sh^t. Only difference is, who are their "sponsors"?
    WADA is not the same as USADA and VADA. WADA just makes the rules basically that anti-doping organisations have to follow. They don't administer tests. USADA and VADA are more similar, and even they aren't the same. USADA is way bigger and is the official anti-doping organisation for the United States, sponsored by the US government. Just like UKAD is the official anti-doping organisation for the United Kingdom, sponsored by the United Kingdom. NSAC is sponsored by The State of Nevada.

    VADA is an independent and not sponsored by the US government or any state. They have only been around for a few years, extremely small organisation, etc. They send their samples for testing to the same lab that USADA sends samples to for results (UCLA). NSAC sends to a lab in Utah. Both the UCLA and Utah labs are WADA-accredited.

    Comment

    • radioraheem
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 5915
      • 165
      • 200
      • 12,234

      #72
      Originally posted by Evol
      "Just to clear things up, Manny didn't care what testing we were doing. He was willing to do VADA or WADA, so there was no argument as far as the testing goes," said Bradley
      VADA did not exist when Floyd originally wanted random drug testing for their negotiated fight. The only organisation that did was USADA. So they were the easiest and only choice by default.

      VADA and NSAC advanced random drug testing came into play years later. VADA came on the scene 1-2 years after Mosley vs. Mayweather, and NSAC's advanced drug testing came into play I think in 2013. Or maybe 2012. Either way, it was years later after the fact.

      Top Rank isn't a fan of VADA really. They prefer using NSAC.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #73
        Originally posted by Weebler I
        Why did Floyd need testing at all, he didn't need it against De La Hoya or Hatton? What happened to easy work?

        He was shook - and that's the real reason he turned the fight down.
        He didn't turn the fight down. Manny did. Shook of testing, I guess. I think it's pretty dumb to ask why someone wants testing. Figure it out.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #74
          Originally posted by bigjavi973
          link please???
          If you didn't know that in 2009-2010 that the NSAC only tested boxers for PEDs once (after the fight), I suggest you stop harassing fighters on Twitter and learn what you're talking about first. My goodness.

          Comment

          • El-blanco
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2014
            • 12647
            • 616
            • 2,141
            • 23,841

            #75
            Pacquiao should fight paulie just for all the **** he talks and beat that attitude out of him.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 49488
              • 5,032
              • 270
              • 104,043

              #76
              Originally posted by Weebler I
              Why did Floyd need testing at all, he didn't need it against De La Hoya or Hatton? What happened to easy work?

              He was shook - and that's the real reason he turned the fight down.
              Hilarious.

              Pacquaio turns down a fight, his team even admit that, and somehow in some parallel universe you live in, it was Floyd who turned it down

              Comment

              • Evol
                Floyd beats Pac
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 10357
                • 242
                • 18
                • 17,030

                #77
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                Hilarious.

                Pacquaio turns down a fight, his team even admit that, and somehow in some parallel universe you live in, it was Floyd who turned it down
                u talking about this statement from roach? when he said the first negotiation was kinda their fault? BUT anything after that was on floyd's part? i mean if u're gonna use a quote to prove a point, atleast post the whole quote and just not what suits ur argument.

                Comment

                • MayMosPeaHop
                  Interim Champion
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 798
                  • 40
                  • 0
                  • 6,958

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Twako
                  the mayweather clan already slandered pacquiao even before any negotiations started, tainting with it bad blood. there were both the A-side, so pac's team bent and gave in a bit but said **** you and your demands if you can't do the same.
                  That is a hoe azz excuse for running away and fighting Clottey. Either Arum knew Manny was using PEDS or just did not want Manny to get his azz beat. There is no in between.

                  Comment

                  • bigjavi973
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2013
                    • 24007
                    • 759
                    • 1,480
                    • 1,236,071

                    #79
                    Originally posted by radioraheem
                    WADA is not the same as USADA and VADA. WADA just makes the rules basically that anti-doping organisations have to follow. They don't administer tests. USADA and VADA are more similar, and even they aren't the same. USADA is way bigger and is the official anti-doping organisation for the United States, sponsored by the US government. Just like UKAD is the official anti-doping organisation for the United Kingdom, sponsored by the United Kingdom. NSAC is sponsored by The State of Nevada.

                    VADA is an independent and not sponsored by the US government or any state. They have only been around for a few years, extremely small organisation, etc. They send their samples for testing to the same lab that USADA sends samples to for results (UCLA). NSAC sends to a lab in Utah. Both the UCLA and Utah labs are WADA-accredited.
                    cool. So why did it matter to floyd is pac used vada instead of usada? Mind you, that ever since tmt fighters got busted by vada, they have been using usada.

                    Comment

                    • bigjavi973
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2013
                      • 24007
                      • 759
                      • 1,480
                      • 1,236,071

                      #80
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      If you didn't know that in 2009-2010 that the NSAC only tested boxers for PEDs once (after the fight), I suggest you stop harassing fighters on Twitter and learn what you're talking about first. My goodness.
                      I do know and im not harrasing anyone.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP