

Are we expected to eat this? This is the biggest load of crap I've ever read in my life. Who's the longest reigning WBU or IBU or WBF champion? Or whatver they are called?
IBO & WBO... jesus christ. The WBO wasn't even recognized by ring before the mid 2000s! How can we now start giving legit world title defences for something like that? Makes no sense. it was a joke belt all the way through the 90s.
The IBO isn't even recognized now! We might as well not have it.
He has accumulated a lot of defences for various belts, and we have to respect that. But we also need to take into context what exactly happened.
Realistically, Wlad hasn't been THE heavyweight champion longer than since Chagaev, or even more factually, Povetkin. Which means his actual 'title' defences i.e. the actual title that can be traced to John L Sullivan counts 9 or 2 if you're factual about it.
Now, before someone says: "there wasn't more belts back in the day", well that simply isn't true and it's bs. There has been multiple belts since the 60s, yet the one everyone counted was the actual, true, lineal defence of the title i.e. the man who beat the man.
So no, Wlad hasn't done anything no other man has done before besides defending a newly created belt no one before him ever cared about in his division.
Add to that, his resume doesn't consist of many world beaters, if any, so I would safely conclude that there's absolute no sane argument to be made that he's #1 of all times. At all.
Comment