Finally watched Bradley vs Chaves, scored it 8-4 Bradley but it was a good, competitive fight.
We've seen Chaves on the big stage 3 times now and he's been competitive all 3 times, I thought he clearly beat Rios, the DQ was ******. There's no shame in losing to Thurman and Bradley in competitive fights, I think both are top 5 welterweights.
Contrary to popular perception, he's more of a boxer than a puncher, he likes to fight at mid range, he's got a good jab when he uses it, throws nice straight shots, counters well. He has no inside game though, he has to resort to holding at close range.
He would do very well against somebody like D.Garcia who doesn't apply pressure/cut the ring off, isn't the best boxer and throws wide shots.
I see him struggling against pure boxers and non-stop action guys like Porter and Maidana who are strong and hit during clinches.
I'd rank him just outside the top 10, he's got solid fundamentals and good skill.
We've seen Chaves on the big stage 3 times now and he's been competitive all 3 times, I thought he clearly beat Rios, the DQ was ******. There's no shame in losing to Thurman and Bradley in competitive fights, I think both are top 5 welterweights.
Contrary to popular perception, he's more of a boxer than a puncher, he likes to fight at mid range, he's got a good jab when he uses it, throws nice straight shots, counters well. He has no inside game though, he has to resort to holding at close range.
He would do very well against somebody like D.Garcia who doesn't apply pressure/cut the ring off, isn't the best boxer and throws wide shots.
I see him struggling against pure boxers and non-stop action guys like Porter and Maidana who are strong and hit during clinches.
I'd rank him just outside the top 10, he's got solid fundamentals and good skill.
Comment