lol at all the people thinking any Wlad fight is pointless whether they're a legit contender or not because they think everybody has that small a chance of winning. Why fight anybody at all, Wlad? Why Bill Gates still make them computers?
Jennings vs klitschko on April 25th
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
RING Heavyweight Rankings (usually the only rankings worth paying attention to):
Champion: Klitschko
1. Povetkin
2. Stiverne
3. Fury
4. Pulev
5. Jennings
6. Wilder
7. Glazkov
8. Perez
9. Arreola
10. Chagaev
ESPN Heavyweight Rankings:
1. Klitschko
2. Stiverne
3. Povetkin
4. Fury
5. Glazkov
6. Chagaev
7. Pulev
8. Wilder
9. Jennings
10. Perez
I don't know why they have Stiverne above Povetkin in the ESPN rankings, especially since they don't even include Arreola in the top 10 and on both lists Jennings has the better win (Perez). I suppose because he has a belt.
Chagaev is not #6 in the world at this point in his career, Wilder is a wildcard on both lists.Last edited by ////; 12-03-2014, 06:45 PM.Comment
-
I think Glazkov drew with Scott, but I had Scott winning by a round or two. I can see Takam being ranked higher or on par with Jennings. He only lost to Povetkin who in my opinion is only second best to Wlad. I think Takam and Jennings are on a similar level.
Do anyone go by Ring rankings these days?
TBRB is the only legit one.Comment
-
Transnational:
C: Wladimir Klitschko
1. Alexander Povetkin
2. Tyson Fury
3. Bermane Stiverne
4. Kubrat Pulev
5. Carlos Takam
6. Deontay Wilder
7. Vyacheslav Glazkov
8. Bryant Jennings
9. Steve Cunningham
10. Mike Perez
Cunningham is a very odd inclusionComment
-
I give him a shot here, i think he is more athletic and possibly better then calvin brock was.... he just has to fight really smart and stick and move.... its harder then it sounds but i think he can put up a better fight then pulev, and that was actually a good klitchko fight....im optimistic about his chances and could see Rahman vs Lewis all over again!Comment
Comment