Comments Thread For: Roach Discusses Mayweather-Cotto Rematch Rumors

[clmags12]

Rumors have been swirling in the industry that Floyd Mayweather Jr. (47-0, 26KOs) is attempting to secure a rematch with Miguel Cotto (39-4, 32KOs) for May 2nd. The two boxers fought an exciting twelve round contest in 2012, with Mayweather winning a twelve round unanimous decision.

Cotto has recovered from that loss in full force, after demolishing Sergio Martinez in June to capture the WBC middleweight title.
[Click Here To Read More]

IMO Cotto should focus on a Canelo bout. Its something new and part of the PR/Mex. Rivalary.

In the article you can tell Freddie wouldn't mind being in Miguel's corner for a Floyd fight

[Dle]

I agree PAC beats Cotto to a pulp but won't stop him this time. Cotto can endure a sustained beating at this stage of his career, unless of course Cotto gets lucky like Marquez had. Probably why Floyd securing his 0 from PAC. 2 years ago...?

[KnickTillDeaTh]

Your a clown dude. Pointless attempt at trying to defend your hero Cotto. Mayweather was talking about the toughest fight he had and he said Augustus. He never specified if he meant up to that point in time.

Yet you assumed he didn't and used it to make a point so whos the real clown? That be you. Yeah assume that Cotto is my hero because it somehow makes your weak post legitimate. Sure.

[KnickTillDeaTh]

I agree PAC beats Cotto to a pulp but won't stop him this time. Cotto can endure a sustained beating at this stage of his career, unless of course Cotto gets lucky like Marquez had. Probably why Floyd securing his 0 from PAC. 2 years ago...?

I really dont think Pac beats Cotto to a pulp, if you watch the first fight Cotto was winning the rounds he got knocked down in. A better game plan and more importantly a sustained game plan at a higher weight would favor Cotto. Is it big enough to tip the scales of victory? Thats a question we would not get an answer too. But I know a lot of people would love to have seen the rematch at 154.

[TMTForever]

This is the trend Cotto fanboys cant seem to get a grasp on. Being recognized as the "lineal'' champion is a joke in itself. Canelo will put to rest any ideas of Cotto being "back", if and when the cherrypicker takes the fight.

cotto actually fought for a lineal title with a belt on the line..pac has fought for a so-called lineal title twoice and no belt was on the line. nbut cotto is a joke. pac is a joke and his fictious 8 titles 6 of which he never fouight for a title and 4 of which were vacant.

[daggum]

cotto actually fought for a lineal title with a belt on the line..pac has fought for a so-called lineal title twoice and no belt was on the line. nbut cotto is a joke. pac is a joke and his fictious 8 titles 6 of which he never fouight for a title and 4 of which were vacant.

guerrero has won more titles than pac. he's a joke.

[Hougigo]

guerrero has won more titles than pac. he's a joke.

How many people have unified interim titles?

Guerrero reks everyone

[Build That Wall]

IMO Cotto should focus on a Canelo bout. Its something new and part of the PR/Mex. Rivalary.

In the article you can tell Freddie wouldn't mind being in Miguel's corner for a Floyd fight

It's not much of a rivalry when the amount of winners is one sided. According to this wikipedia page on the Mex Pr Rivalry. Mexico is beating them by a landslide. It is a legit rivalry when it comes to competitiveness. By any other means, The rivalry represents Mexican Dominance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico%E2%80%93Puerto_Rico_boxing_rivalry

Mexico: 41
PR: 20

[TMTForever]

guerrero has won more titles than pac. he's a joke.

naw pac is the worst..who goes around saying they won 8 titles and in two of the fights there were no titles on the line.. they started making up titles to give pac everytime he fought that's how bad his career is.

[Mike D]

Is your name really TMTForever?

Dude. Change that ish. You sound like a pre-teen girl groupie for some whack ass boy band.

There's gotta be something better than TMTForever....there just has to be.