Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lennox beats Vlad all day

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    My opinions:

    1. Lewis KOs Wlad, both atg Hwts, Lewis has slight advantages and is more willing to put them in play.

    2. Lewis beats Vitali. Can't be disputed, that's how it went down.

    3. Lewis/Vitali was a justified stoppage

    4. At the time of stoppage, Vitali was ahead 4-2 rds

    5. At the time of stoppage, Lewis had the momentum

    6. If the bout would have continued, Lewis would have won by KO

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by PainfromUkraine View Post
      It was one cut that was the cause for the end of the fight. The rest were superficial and would have allowed Vitali to continue fighting. So yes, actually it WAS one cut.

      [IMG][/IMG]

      Just putting the stats out there for people who think Lewis could be winning on points and if Vitali was as tired as Lennox. IMO he wasn't but even if he was, maybe it's cause he threw 210 more punches!
      Lol Lewis was landing at a higher percentage tho

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Tedkidlewis View Post
        Lennox and Vitali fought once. Lennox smashed his face to pieces. Get over it.
        They never will and they will tell you that Vlad beat a fighter the quality of anything Lewis faced when he beat this latest tomatoe can....watch. The brigade should be arriving shortly.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by BronzeBomber View Post
          Lol Lewis was landing at a higher percentage tho
          Basic math buddy...you throw less and generally you will connect more, or rather have a better %. I could throw 10 punches and land 5 while my opponent throws 100 and lands 40. So 50% for me and 40% for them - will I say "but I got a higher land % doe"?

          Take B-hop v Kovalev as an example - B-hop landed 33 percent - 65 punches of 196, while Kovalev landed "just" 28 percent, by your logic, but 166 punches out of 585 thrown. And everyone can see that's a one sided dominant blow out. So, as a response to some posters who go like punch stats don't matter...well they kinda do, even though this isnt the ams!

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            wlad wasn't even good enough to be a top contender during the lewis era. he was there but he just couldn't make it to the top. only when the contenders started getting really bad did he "dominate" with help from his brother of course.
            that was a mere coincidence haven't you heard? Vlad came of age with green lantern i mean Stewart and now he would teach that Lewis Feller a lesson! And Vitalie was winning that fight! With the right sewing kit Lewis woulda been toast.

            Comment


            • #46
              LL takes him out within 6 rounds

              Soon as LL connects, which wont be hard, its over, also LL throws combs from range and on the inside, he was devastating

              Wlad would not have survived the onslaught Vitali took from a older Lewis

              This is no diss to Wlad, he is a great boxer, highly skilled, but he'd come unstuck against a guy like LL, stylistically LL is all wrong for Wlad

              Its like the student against the Master.

              Had Wlad had a chin like Lewis, he would have been the complete fighter as far as inside game

              Wlad had to sacrifice a part of his game to be a true champion. When Manny came on aboard, he erased all of Wlads inside game..

              I know Wlad fans are going to get angry, but they know the truth deep down inside

              I have no issues with Wlad and i am not insulting him, i regard him as the main man in the HW division.
              Last edited by FrankieBruno; 11-17-2014, 09:01 PM.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by PainfromUkraine View Post
                It was one cut that was the cause for the end of the fight. The rest were superficial and would have allowed Vitali to continue fighting. So yes, actually it WAS one cut.

                [IMG][/IMG]

                Just putting the stats out there for people who think Lewis could be winning on points and if Vitali was as tired as Lennox. IMO he wasn't but even if he was, maybe it's cause he threw 210 more punches!
                How did you get the F word past the censors? that is more impressive than any Vlad victory imo! Pain don't let these goons get to you, me and Kane go way back actually!! He just does not recognize me here. They just want your panties to knot up like Vlad's face! Now teach me how to use the F word here!

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by PainfromUkraine View Post
                  It was one cut that was the cause for the end of the fight. The rest were superficial and would have allowed Vitali to continue fighting. So yes, actually it WAS one cut.

                  [IMG][/IMG]

                  Just putting the stats out there for people who think Lewis could be winning on points and if Vitali was as tired as Lennox. IMO he wasn't but even if he was, maybe it's cause he threw 210 more punches!
                  Four cuts aren't a fluke.

                  If they fight 10 times, there's nothing about four cuts that suggests Klitschko wouldn't be cut again.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Lewis would stop Wlad in about 6 rounds. I just rewatched the Pulev fight, this time a good quality version (not a stream) and Wladimir would have no chance against Lewis. Lewis could do everything Wladimir does and more. For example Lewis could fight very well on the inside too, whereas all Wladimir can do is clinch. Wladimir would get destroyed by Lewis within 6 rounds.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by PainfromUkraine View Post
                      Basic math buddy...you throw less and generally you will connect more, or rather have a better %. I could throw 10 punches and land 5 while my opponent throws 100 and lands 40. So 50% for me and 40% for them - will I say "but I got a higher land % doe"?

                      Take B-hop v Kovalev as an example - B-hop landed 33 percent - 65 punches of 196, while Kovalev landed "just" 28 percent, by your logic, but 166 punches out of 585 thrown. And everyone can see that's a one sided dominant blow out. So, as a response to some posters who go like punch stats don't matter...well they kinda do, even though this isnt the ams!
                      ok i guess thats kind of right tho....but ive seen the fight lots of times...first 2 maybe 3 rounds go to vitali. But you can see after those rounds lewis was establishing himself and vitali looked gasses and was surviving... if not the cut i still think lewis would have knocked him out

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP