Lennox beats Vlad all day

[beez721]

I like both champions and both were trained by manny steward. Wich may be a result of why their stlyes are kind of similair along with size and weight, but i do think if i am not wrong that lennox has a longer reach and weighs a tiny bit more.

The reason Lennox beats vlad is because he does everything vlad does but better in my opinion. He also has devastating power but he isnt as hesitant, he will throw combos all out in the first round if he has too and isnt as restrained as wlad behind the jab but can also box eqaully as good behind the jab maybe wlad has a tiny tiny jab advantage (maybe).

So i see lennox winning because he is just more versatile and not as hesitant and takes more chances. Because in a fight like this it could all depend on timing of one shot, and lennox will go all out quicker without thinking two steps ahead like wlad does and clinches. Not to mention lennox throws punches liek the uppercut in the clinch will great power so wlad would have a disadvantage in the clinch.

Lennox is just a better wlad imo

Id lean toward lewis but it wouldnt be without danger for ll. wlad seems to get the hook off better against guys his size that hes not crouching down at so that could be a factor. but lennox was more versatile and would have the advantage

[KO'er]

Lewis would win.

[bojangles1987]

Is anyone actually dis*****g this?

A lot of people are dis*****g it. For some reason.

Lennox is a nightmare for Wlad.

[PainfromUkraine]

There is no 10 fight period. Vitali had his shot against the worst Lennox Lewis and lost. This debate gets really boring. It was a fair fight. Lewis won. No controversy, just a bad loser that had his face smashed to bits.

As you say, the debate is very boring and I am not gonna bother starting one now, but if you think there is no controversy then you must be a moron. As you say, he lost because 'he had his face smashed to bits', aka cuts. Take away cuts, and he was winning the fight on points, outlanded Lewis, and was still strong in the 6th round - no idea why that round was given to Lewis, the only punch that was notable that he landed in that round was THAT uppercut, where Vitali proved he could take a flush power shot from Lennox. In other words, take away the cuts and it was Lewis that was far more tired in there and struggling to go on. Did he look eager to keep fighting at the end? No.

And yes, you will say - but, if, etc...but all I will say is, I take away cuts in the conversation of a series of fights between these guys because there is no way you can ascertain that if they were to fight again any more cuts would occur. And from the first fight, Vitali proved he was fighting a better fight than Lewis. Cuts are freak occurrences. So, if you take away the cuts Lewis did not show that he could outbox Vitali or definitely beat him.

So no way you can say there was no controversy and it was a definitive proof that Lewis would win anyday. Maybe he would, but that is a pretty ****** thing to say IMO.

[Tedkidlewis]

I already said, Wlad does not go 3 rounds with Lewis.

End of discussion.

[beez721]

A lot of people are dis*****g it. For some reason.

Lennox is a nightmare for Wlad.

theyre a nightmare for each other. theyve both been kayoed by guys that dont hit as hard as each other. either one could get put to sleep. slight edge to lewis tho

[Tedkidlewis]

As you say, the debate is very boring and I am not gonna bother starting one now, but if you think there is no controversy then you must be a moron. As you say, he lost because 'he had his face smashed to bits', aka cuts. Take away cuts, and he was winning the fight on points, outlanded Lewis, and was still strong in the 6th round - no idea why that round was given to Lewis, the only punch that was notable that he landed in that round was THAT uppercut, where Vitali proved he could take a flush power shot from Lennox. In other words, take away the cuts and it was Lewis that was far more tired in there and struggling to go on. Did he look eager to keep fighting at the end? No.

And yes, you will say - but, if, etc...but all I will say is, I take away cuts in the conversation of a series of fights between these guys because there is no way you can ascertain that if they were to fight again any more cuts would occur. And from the first fight, Vitali proved he was fighting a better fight than Lewis. Cuts are freak occurrences.

So no way you can say there was no controversy and it was a definitive proof that Lewis would win anyday. Maybe he would, but that is a pretty ****** thing to say IMO.

Are you still talking about Vitali getting beat up by Lewis?

They fought. Lewis won.

End of discussion.

[////]

It's a close fight between two great modern HWs. I give the odds edge to Lewis.

A nice break from seeing them matched up with 1936 carnival champion cornelius mcgee.

[PainfromUkraine]

Are you still talking about Vitali getting beat up by Lewis?

They fought. Lewis won.

End of discussion.

And you're ignorant. Funny thing is I am not even dis*****g THAT fight. Lewis won. I am saying that if they were to fight multiple times, Vitali would win more times. That's my H2H OPINION. Deal with it. End of discussion.

[daggum]

wlad wasn't even good enough to be a top contender during the lewis era. he was there but he just couldn't make it to the top. only when the contenders started getting really bad did he "dominate" with help from his brother of course.