Pulev is garbage; the HW div. is trash.

[Foreign Soil]

Thank God!



No, he had more everything.

Absolutely wrong, in every way.

[LacedUp]

Byrd was much better than Moorer who had more power but simply wouldn't make a difference Byrd was that much better.

Byrd had a better chin too.

Why/how would/could anyone dispute that?

This can only say hater!

If Moorer had fought klitschko, then it would have been the other way around. Stack up '94 Moorer vs '00 Byrd and you get a replica of the Ibeabuchi-Byrd fight.

Even someone like Wach would have a chance to starch Bruno. But Bruno is legend doe.

Lol in Klitschko land maybe.

Moorer did bash Foreman before getting clipped.

Moorer also stands no chance against Klitschko, and probably not any other top 10 HW today whatsoever.

Only in Klitschko land does this matter. In the actual world, what matters is the end result.

[daggum]

Thank God!



No, he had more everything.

not true. pulev had more back fat

[LacedUp]

Absolutely wrong, in every way.

Coming from a guy who started following boxing less than a year ago, who, and I'd bet my life on this, has probably never watched a full Moorer fight - probably not even a full Byrd fight, then excuse me if I don't take your opinion too seriously kid.

[Elroy1]

Agreed. Not even close. Byrd was not only easily the better boxer with a better chin, but also had a better career defending his belt.

Yes. Not to mention their common opponent in Tua illustrates the fine skill difference too. A straight forward ****er, Moorer was immediately overwhelmed and Byrd bent around him like he couldn't box.

[Tedkidlewis]

Bruno was big and strong and athletic but absolutely terrible boxer.

He was on about par with Ray Austin.

He is a very underated boxer, he was beating lewis, Witherspoon and Smith before being stopped. It was ultimately stamina and his chin letting him down.

[GoldenGloveLove]

You said, without quoting anyone:

"People who don't understand boxing does not understand the difference between fighting crap opposition and making your opposition look like crap" or something like that.

Now, I'm asking, what does it take to "understand" boxing how are you in a position to understand it better than anyone else? And then I said, Pulev clearly wasn't great opposition as was proven by his recent fights where he showed he had a bad defence, for example letting a 42 year old fat never-been Tony Thompson hit him with 42% of his power shots. Impressive huh?

I never said anything about your comment about Pulev. You just started replying to me. I can tell you're argumentative and not the sharpest right now so when someone replies without a quote to a thread, namely me, you can probably assume they are/I am directly replying to the original post. Which I was. I don't know why you think you're in an argument with me, maybe you're drunk? Sleep it off. Maybe we can talk again when you're more with it and don't want to nitpick a random semantic argument to feel hard or whatever.

[LacedUp]

not true. pulev had more back fat

Being fatter is better. And older too.

According to Elroy, the version of Mercer that fought Wlad was better than the Mercer that fought Holmes.

And Marvis and Joe Frazier were pracically the same level of fighter.

[Elroy1]

Coming from a guy who started following boxing less than a year ago, who, and I'd bet my life on this, has probably never watched a full Moorer fight - probably not even a full Byrd fight, then excuse me if I don't take your opinion too seriously kid.

Why would anyone make strong comments if they haven't seen the fights?

How come anybody who doesn't agree with your blatantly wrong and baseless opinion gets told they are a "kid" who "knows nothing of boxing"?

You are barely 30 right?

Your a joke man, your trolling isn't up to scratch anymore. Your not doing it right Haven't I taught you ANYTHING

[LacedUp]

Yes. Not to mention their common opponent in Tua illustrates the fine skill difference too. A straight forward ****er, Moorer was immediately overwhelmed and Byrd bent around him like he couldn't box.

Let's forget that Moorer has retired and was way out of his prime, hadn't fought anybody in 5 years.

And we know triangle theories work in boxing.

Sanders knocked a prime Wlad out with ease, Machimana knocked out Sanders with ease.

Machimana > Klitschko.