Who Is The Greatest Mexican Fighter Of All-Time?
Collapse
-
-
I'm still troubled to who to give my vote, to me it's really close between Chavez and Sanchez. However I'll vote to one of them two. Richardt have point about Finito's opponent, that made me rethink of his greatness, but one thing is sure - techniquly he was beautiful to watch. Aaaand I think that Morales is very underated, I rank him above Morales (and Barrera for that matter).Comment
-
I see your point, not debating it. Marquez, Morales and Barrera have such a comparable career that it is hard to pick which one was more accomplishedif erik morales ended his career after the 1st pacquiao fight with a career record of 48 and 2(only 2 losses 2 barrera but 1 win for erik vs barrera)
how great would he be remembered, would he woulda wound up as the greatest mexican fighter of all time, knowing hes beaten every fighter hes faced at least one time and hes only lost to 1 fighter in a really close fight twice(barrera)
morales resume woulda been crazy(48-2 arguably 50 and 0 if not from close decision)
wins over...................
zaragoza
j.jones
espadas(twice)
hernandez
ayala
j.chavez
k.kelley
mc collough
chi
ramirez
barrera
pacquiao
would he been considered the greatest mexican boxer of all time considering hes a 3 weight division world champ and last fighter to have beaten prime pacquiao in boxing at 48 and 2
i personally think he was the greatest mexican fighter ever but everyone disagrees and i think if he ended his career after the pacquiao fight, i think morales woulda been easily in the top 15 greatest fighters of all time
what do people think about morales, the most exciting fighter arguably in boxing history, the type of fighter who fights for the fans
el terrible
after his prime, morales still did something even though he wasnt as great as he once was...........................
morales should be a 5 division champ, got robbed vs diaz(only 4 division)
by the way, barrera lost twice to sorry azz junior jones, morales beat him in 5 rounds,
barrera lost twice to pacquiao, lol, morales beat manny one time,
barrera was a 3 division champ,
morales was a 4 division champ,
hamed never beat any good fighter, the best fighter that hamed has ever beaten was kevin kelley and kevin kelley isnt a great, lol, hamed got dropped many times by kevin kelley, hamed was overated as **** homie, after he got exposed, he retired cause he knew he wasnt that good, lol, barreras win vs hamed means **** to meComment
-
pretty much. if he did what he did in this day and age, all anyone would talk about is how he's going to end up being the greatest fighter ever. he'd be the lebron of boxing.Comment
-
Lopez and Chavez accomplished the most and Sanchez in my opinion was destined to be even greater than them too if he have lived long enough. Chavez is in my top 3-4 favorites of all time and I love everything about his style, his legendary toughness and his facial expression that's saying "I could beat you up sooooo bad like no one in your life, only if wanted... (but I won't because I'm such a cool guy)"
you MUST love it, he is the face of boxing with his legendary toughness... while Lopez is not classic mexican boxer, he PERFECTED every move in the ring that it was incredible to watch, every move was fluent. The greatest ever in his weightclass(es), you could only question the level of his opponent that was never rich that much in these weightclasses. He had suspectable chin to say at least but it's not his fault and even those fights where he was dropped, he got up and won them all (convincingly).
How did Lopez accomplish the most?Comment
-
what a clown........Originally posted by #YOLORicardo Lopez is overrated, he should not be above the trio. Sanchez died too soon so can't give him credit for fantasy potential career. Chavez is clearly the best.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
Comment