Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Froch an ATG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by HughJass View Post



    "Our" Carl put the poopies up Andre.
    if you can fight off the tears, turn the sound off and watch this fight.

    focus on the punches landed, and their effect. that's how you score a fight.


    take your union jack underpants off, and give an unbiased card. the fight was not close. froch was completely outclassed.

    Comment


    • post the link, NE, you tosser.


      Comment


      • Originally posted by New England View Post
        if you can fight off the tears, turn the sound off and watch this fight.

        focus on the punches landed, and their effect. that's how you score a fight.


        take your union jack underpants off, and give an unbiased card. the fight was not close. froch was completely outclassed.
        LOL

        Comment


        • Froch never even moved up in weight. He was never considered the best fighter in his weight class. He is borderline HOF at best right now.

          Comment


          • What the hell makes Froch's resume so great? Who the **** is Groves? So he destroyed a brittle Bute and beat Kessler 7 years after Calzaghe did. Is Kessler even a great fighter? I would argue he was very good at best.

            This idea that the Super Middle division is so great just because they made some tourney years ago doesn't make sense to me. Froch had had a good career and has a solid resume. The man never even tried to test the waters at 175.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by New England View Post

              we can go through froch's resume in greater detail, if you'd like.

              pascal was at the wrong weight
              taylor was shot
              abraham is a limited fighter
              johnson was at the wrong weight, and shot
              yusaf mack was at the wrong weight, shot, and always ******
              lucian bute is the most overrated fighter of the last 10 years, and his overrating was in direct response to ward hatred.
              froch needed a rematchw ith groves. froch was literally out on his feet in the first fight.

              he lost to ward, and kessler in the first fight. he beat a clearly faded kessler in the rematch. he's expressed that he's got no interest in even fighting ward again.


              he's overrated by euros as a backlash against the greatness of the prince. it is what it is.
              Are you really playing the resume trash game? That's about as pathetic as it gets for a boxing fan, triangle theories aside. Look what I can do:

              Andre Ward:

              Kessler - Euro bum whose only significant win is over another Euro bum in Froch.

              Allan Green - club fighter with power, with no significant win on his record.

              Sakio Bika - just a dirty mauler, again without a significant victory to his name.

              Arthur Abraham - shot version of Abraham who had already been schooled twice by injury-faker Dirrell and Euro bum Froch.

              Carl Froch - Euro bum with lots of wins against fighters with lots of asterisks next to their name,

              Chad Dawson - shot fighter down at a weight he couldn't make safely.

              Edwin Rodriguez - weak challenger with no significant win.

              It's really easy to either dismiss or devalue just about any win on any record in the sport. Your game is really ****ing weak and you completely undermined your own point about Ward not struggling in the final rounds against Froch. I completely agree, I'm a fan of both fighters and I thought Ward won virtually every round. Stay away from this resume bull****.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by P4P Opinion View Post
                Are you really playing the resume trash game? That's about as pathetic as it gets for a boxing fan, triangle theories aside. Look what I can do:

                Andre Ward:

                Kessler - Euro bum whose only significant win is over another Euro bum in Froch.

                Allan Green - club fighter with power, with no significant win on his record.

                Sakio Bika - just a dirty mauler, again without a significant victory to his name.

                Arthur Abraham - shot version of Abraham who had already been schooled twice by injury-faker Dirrell and Euro bum Froch.

                Carl Froch - Euro bum with lots of wins against fighters with lots of asterisks next to their name,

                Chad Dawson - shot fighter down at a weight he couldn't make safely.

                Edwin Rodriguez - weak challenger with no significant win.

                It's really easy to either dismiss or devalue just about any win on any record in the sport. Your game is really ****ing weak and you completely undermined your own point about Ward not struggling in the final rounds against Froch. I completely agree, I'm a fan of both fighters and I thought Ward won virtually every round. Stay away from this resume bull****.

                my game is weak .
                what does that mean, exactly?


                "are you really sh#tting on our carl's resume in a thread about whether or not he's an ATG?"
                is that what you are asking?


                is froch the best / greatest SMW of his era?

                Comment


                • NO! Good Career Tough!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by New England View Post
                    if you can fight off the tears, turn the sound off and watch this fight.

                    focus on the punches landed, and their effect. that's how you score a fight.


                    take your union jack underpants off, and give an unbiased card. the fight was not close. froch was completely outclassed.
                    Ward's PEDs started to wear off in the later rounds and he was hanging on for dear life.

                    Froch stops him in a 15 rounder or with random testing.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by New England View Post
                      my game is weak .
                      what does that mean, exactly?


                      "are you really sh#tting on our carl's resume in a thread about whether or not he's an ATG?"
                      is that what you are asking?


                      is froch the best / greatest SMW of his era?
                      It means that you're really awful at making your point and you make yourself sound like a child. I'm asking why you'd devalue your own point with logic-free nonsense like resume-trashing. It's only a step above the triangle theory (fighter A beat fighter B, and fighter B beat fighter C, therefore fighter A must beat fighter C - just in case you're unaware). It's really easy to pick apart even the best resume if you look at every victory from a negatively subjective viewpoint. It's pathetic.

                      No, Carl Froch is not the best/greatest SMW of his era, but that's not the point I've tried to make. It's utterly irrelevant. Not that you're capable of keeping on track in a debate. Critical thinking skills are rarely present on this forum. I'm actually a huge fan of Andre Ward (seen him live twice now, once against Froch and once against Dawson), I'm just a fan of Carl Froch as well. They are both fantastic for the sport.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP