Comments Thread For: Canelo Feels Lara 'Doesn't Deserve' A Rematch

[LouIE G]

No man won that fight

I hate that Canelo seems to be gathering indecisive 'victories' where he didn't clearly win. Exactly like the Trout fight.

All Canelo has to do is make a fight a 115-113 type of fight, and he'll automatically win it. He only has 1 decisive win over 'acceptable' opposition recently, and thats Angulo. And that wasn't even at a weight class were both fighters are ranked.

I had it a draw, but you do not win a fight by running....the aggressive fighter in most cases will be given the benefit of the doubt................ in most cases...

[-PBP-]

Not true. I felt like Lara could have got the nod. But I'm also not mad at the close decision. Lara avoided Canelo at all costs and Canelo did more damage.

I don't care for a rematch because I dont care for boxers that don't come to fight. If your whole intention is just to sc**** by on the cards, then that's cool for you. For me, GTFO with that garbage. Imo, you come to win, and you come to fight, and bewilder and punk your opponent. Leave no doubt. Like yeah b1tch, I just whooped your ass.

And if you CANT do that, then you go out trying to. On your shield. But that's just me. Some people like to watch amateur style fights in the PROS.

He showed up to win. Canelo is a good fighter. Lara can't beat him 118-110. They could fight 10 times and it will be the same result.

[Nomadic]

He don't, I thought he was going to **** with Canelo like he did Angulo, instead, we seed a Donaire and Rigondeaux rematch.

[techliam]

Not true. I felt like Lara could have got the nod. But I'm also not mad at the close decision. Lara avoided Canelo at all costs and Canelo did more damage.

I don't care for a rematch because I dont care for boxers that don't come to fight. If your whole intention is just to sc**** by on the cards, then that's cool for you. For me, GTFO with that garbage. Imo, you come to win, and you come to fight, and bewilder and punk your opponent. Leave no doubt. Like yeah b1tch, I just whooped your ass.

Canelo didn't exactly do this with Trout and Lara though did he

As for your first sentence, when analysing Canelo as a fighter, you surely can't claim Canelo is any better than Trout or Lara when those fights were fights that both could have won, only depending on what influence the judges have (especially in the Trout case)?

[techliam]

I had it a draw, but you do not win a fight by running....the aggressive fighter in most cases will be given the benefit of the doubt................ in most cases...

Well I can respect that, but then surely you agree with me here?

Canelo didn't exactly do this with Trout and Lara though did he

As for your first sentence, when analysing Canelo as a fighter, you surely can't claim Canelo is any better than Trout or Lara when those fights were fights that both could have won, only depending on what influence the judges have (especially in the Trout case)?

I dont claim you think otherwise

[VAGAB0ND]

Oh no, prepare for The Attack Of The 10 Cubans, .

[SeekDaGreat]

Canelo didn't exactly do this with Trout and Lara though did he

As for your first sentence, when analysing Canelo as a fighter, you surely can't claim Canelo is any better than Trout or Lara when those fights were fights that both could have won, only depending on what influence the judges have (especially in the Trout case)?

I didn't say better. All three of those fighters have strengths and weaknesses. That's why they were mainly close fights.

There's things Canelo does that Lara & Trout can't do (or atleast very well) and vise versa. There's a reason Lara was moving literally every moment of every round and still was leaking like a faucet from a vicious upper cut. That's no coincidence.

[LouIE G]

Well I can respect that, but then surely you agree with me here?



I dont claim you think otherwise

I can agree with you... canelo/trout was a close fight too that could have gone either way.. but this is what happens when you fight the best in your division, your not gonna always blow out the other fighter especially if their at that elite level as canelo is imo.... when the best fight the best 9 out 10 times its going to be a close fight and canelo is daring to be great so he deserves alot of credit from his retractors.

[KO MX]

Canelo didn't exactly do this with Trout and Lara though did he

As for your first sentence, when analysing Canelo as a fighter, you surely can't claim Canelo is any better than Trout or Lara when those fights were fights that both could have won, only depending on what influence the judges have (especially in the Trout case)?

what the hell you're talking about ?Canelo clearly beat Trout, he was dodging his punches like sweet pea

[techliam]

I didn't say better. All three of those fighters have strengths and weaknesses. That's why they were mainly close fights.

There's things Canelo does that Lara & Trout can't do (or atleast very well) and vise versa. There's a reason Lara was moving literally every moment of every round and still was leaking like a faucet from a vicious upper cut. That's no coincidence.

I agree with what you say

I believe both the Trout and Lara fights warrant rematches. But as boxing is so far removed as a sport, and now operates way more as a business, you can argue against it